South Australia In Focus
Lifestyle • Politics • Culture
Response to the Australian Human Rights Commission, claim against employer
After a failed attempt to have a Royal Commission into the Australian COVID-19 Pandemic Response, does Australia need a Bill of Rights?
post photo preview
Screen capture of Australian Human Rights Commission - Wikipedia search preview

For those of you who have been following my journey over the past three and half years, some of the information in my response to the Australian Human Rights Commission will come as no surprise.

For those who are new, my termination is only a small part of my fight against Australia’s bureaucracies after being rattled awake from living a relatively normal existence prior to January 2020.

I consider myself to be part of the middle class, I left school after completing Year 10, I did not attend university, but had a strong work ethic and worked hard to provide for my family while living within our means and saving for the occasional family holiday.

I have never claimed to be an expert in anything which I have presented via my publicly available correspondence covering various issues over the past three years, I simply wanted answers to issues that were unfolding in front of me.

Seeing that the Union which I was part of when the so-called pandemic started, were left wanting in response to the mandating of experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure to employees, I chose to resign and joined the Red Union, who have been working behind the scenes to get resolutions for many Australians since their inception.

The Australian Human Rights Commission has sought clarification about the claim against my ex-employer. So, as I have done with much of my previous correspondence, I am sharing my response to the Commission below, not to be self-indulgent, but to spark further debate and discussion around how we can do things better into the future.

To this end, before moving on to read my response, I share this recent opinion, which makes sense to me, considering the many failed attempts to date to recompense Australians due to mandates. I do so in the hope that it sparks further discussion, debate, clarification, even rebuttal on how best to approach future nation destroying events.

Thinking about the argument for “bodily autonomy” in the Australian Constitution


The Australian Constitution has no concept of protecting individuals, as in a "bill of rights"


It is a document on the governing a federation of independent colonies, renamed "states", which have their own laws, separately developed, due to the "tyranny of distance", until the telegraph line was completed in 1872. Australia was established in 1900 as a federation of "united states", but without a revolution like America, where slavery and government tyranny gave rise to the idea of individual freedom enshrined in the US Constitution.


As penal colonies from its beginning, the concept of "individual rights" was obviously incompatible in colonial governments; freedom was only granted by the state. The Australian Constitution is essentially a document listing a set of 39 tasks which Federal Government should accomplish, with implied powers to override state laws, where necessary.


Outside the 39 tasks, the Federal Government has no power vested by the Constitution. Australian health is largely a state matter, except when the states come together by agreement.


The Australian Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government over the states, by stating what it can do.


This explains why, on the matter of individual rights in relation to health, the Australian Constitution is useless. Section (xxiiiA) limits the Federal Government from conscripting the services of doctors and dentists. The Federal Government has no power to issue “vaccine” mandates for Australia.


The historical origin and the underlying assumption of Australian laws is that Australians are granted freedom to the extent by the states. There are no innate "individual rights". The bottom line is: Australian colonial history does not help Australian laws in preventing government tyranny. Progress may occur on a state-by-state basis, as in America.


Credit - Dr Wilson Sy

From: erich.neug [email protected]

To: Human Rights team[email protected]

CC: Info Service[email protected]

Date: Saturday, August 19th, 2023 at 5:47 PM


Response to Australian Human Rights Commission

Mark Neugebauer regarding *********REDACTED********* Clarifications. 


Firstly, thank you for acknowledging the lodgement of my complaint against *********REDACTED*********, my employer prior to being terminated, for not receiving what is now more aptly referred to as a “Countermeasure” (1)


Below I will elaborate further on my submission, whilst acknowledging this reference from your email: “Please note, this matter has not yet been accepted as a complaint.”


I will premise the remainder of my correspondence to you on these two points. I will assert that as a result of my own independent investigations as presented directly to **REDACTED** in (Annexure 4_COVID_19_Correspondence_Employment termination) (2) and the confirmation by the then Australian Federal Minister of Health, Greg Hunt’s admission “that the world is engaged in the largest clinical trial ever”,



That not just my human rights (4) have been breached, but that my termination also goes against the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code. (5)


With this reply I declare that my human rights have been breached by **REDACTED**  who as an organisation became a tool of the State and Federal Government, as they have provided no evidence to indicate that **REDACTED**  sought to legally challenge the State Government of South Australia, namely the Minister for Health Stephen Wade and SA Health under the leadership of the then CMO, Nicola Spurrier, who was also part of National Cabinet, surrounding the validity and legality of the mandates enacted on the Disability Sector for staff to receive the COVID-19 Countermeasures.


Even though, these entities put in place mechanisms for a mandate, of which the legality based on my opening premise, still have not been properly tested under South Australian and Federal laws, I was not employed by those entities.


But instead, I was employed by **REDACTED**  directly, and my contract of employment and position description for the role I was undertaking was with **REDACTED**, which up until the date of my termination did not stipulate that there was a requirement for me to receive an experimental still in trial phase gene therapy countermeasure for me to fulfill my role as an employee with **REDACTED**, and therefore **REDACTED**  has breached their duty of care to protect my Human Rights for coercing me to take the countermeasure under threat of termination, which is ultimately what eventuated.


I also declare that there needs to be a further investigation into the breach of my human rights and breaches of the Nuremberg Code by **REDACTED**, and specifically the CEO of **REDACTED**  for being involved in openly lobbying for me to receive an experimental still in trial phase gene therapy countermeasure, (6) as part of his position as Board Member for the **REDACTED** (7) Not to mention the further investigations which need to be undertaken into links between the planning at event 201



Of which Australia’s Jane Halton took part, strongly advocating for Australia’s CEO’s to be part of increasing the countermeasure uptake.




Does the Australian Human Rights Commission have the scope to investigate if there were financial incentives for Australian CEO’s and organisations to push the countermeasures, seeing Australian Politicians are so averse to getting to the bottom of these type of questions? (10) I wonder why?


So, moving on, regarding the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.


Article 1 (11), states:

“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”

I declare that my Human Rights have been breached at Article 1 by **REDACTED**, as I have not been acted towards in a spirit of brotherhood. It has been assumed that I, as a Human being, having been born free and equal in dignity and rights, lack reason in being able to establish through independent research (12) of globally available resources from 2020 to current, that the countermeasures were not required for my employment at **REDACTED**. My research during this time indicated, and continues to show, that the countermeasures were neither safer nor more effective than my natural immunity, they were not effective at stopping transmissibility, nor being able to create less of a viral load than natural infection.

My Human rights in respect to my conscience have also been breached by **REDACTED**, due to the fact that my independent research of globally available resources indicated that the countermeasures, were in fact not as safe or effective as claimed by the manufacturers of the product, and I could not in good conscience receive the countermeasures for myself, nor recommend them for people living with a disability, (13) whom I was responsible for in my positions as team leader and support worker.


Article 3, (14) states:

“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person.”

The free dictionary defines (15) “PERSONAL SECURITY” as “The legal and uninterrupted enjoyment by a man of his life, his body, his health and his reputation. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 202.”

I declare that my Human Rights have been breached at Article 3 by **REDACTED** as they enacted coercive pressure on me to take the experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure under threat of termination of employment, even though I had not breached my position description or contract of employment. Their coercive actions threatened my Personal Security of uninterrupted enjoyment of my body and my health, including my overall mental health during these times.


Article 19 (16), states:

“Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

I declare that my Human Rights have been breached by **REDACTED**, as indicated by the record of conversation completed by the Director of Client Services (2) of **REDACTED**  while still employed in the position of Team Leader, there was pressure to censor the ability for me to share evolving research and important information, including from some of the world’s most imminent scientists, doctors, actuaries, statisticians, etc.

It would be worth an investigation to know whether **REDACTED**, the NDIS, NQSC, SA Health had any part in eventually managing to get my LinkedIn profile shut down altogether, but I’m not holding my breath. And seeing our politicians are averse to a Royal Commission, I doubt our governments involvement in shutting down my free speech (17) on other platforms will ever be fully investigated either. So is it any wonder there is pushback against New ACMA powers to combat misinformation and disinformation (the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2023, (18) even from Australian Human Rights lawyers.


In context of the above information, my Human Rights claim against *********REDACTED*********, is as follows:

1.       The CEO of **REDACTED** actively campaigned via media and in his role as board member for the *********REDACTED********* to mandate an experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure to the Disability Workforce? Questions arising from this:

o    Was pressure exerted from either the Federal Government, State Government, or via Jane Halton resulting from the Event 201 simulation to push for the mandate in turn violating my human rights?

o    Did the Federal Government, State Government, or other corporate institutions provide financial or other personal and organisational benefits to push for the mandate in turn violating my human rights?


2.       There was no further investigation on **REDACTED** part to seek and present legal advice as to whether their decision to blindly accept SA Health’s mandating of the experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure to workers.

o   In fact, It was easier for **REDACTED** at the time to terminate my employment under the direction of the Emergency Management (In-home and Community Aged Care and Disability Support Workers Vaccination) (COVID-19) Direction 2021 (“Direction”), (19) without further consideration that this may actually breach my human rights.

o   And of course, why would they, when the CEO was actively campaigning for the workforce to be mandated to receive the experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure. (See above claim 1 and questions arising from this)


3.       Even though I had proven myself to be an exemplary employee in both my capacity as Team Leader and Disability Support worker, with many transferable skills to take on other roles within the organisation, **REDACTED** found it easier to Terminate my employment as opposed to investigating non client facing positions within **REDACTED**, as per their response to my correspondence.

o   As with many Australian organisations, it was easier for **REDACTED**  to remove someone who questioned the narrative of mandates and COVID response as quickly as possible, how convenient for them to be provided this opportunity by the state government, and not able to be challenged for doing so.

o   So, for the first time in my 38-year working life I was terminated from my employment, and not even as result of anything I had done wrong, but merely for choosing not to submit to an experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure. What human rights?


4.       I was rewarded for my exemplary service to **REDACTED** by being stood down from paid shifts from 1st December 2021 and provided with my Termination letter on the 7th of December 2021.

o   The termination letter stated that I was entitled to 4 weeks’ notice and that my effective termination date was in fact the 4th of January 2022.

o   But here is the reward for my diligent service, **REDACTED** claim that I was not entitled to payment for this 4 weeks’ notice because apparently, I was not entitled to work because of the Emergency Management (In-home and Community Aged Care and Disability Support Workers Vaccination) (COVID-19) Direction 2021 (“Direction”) So they were spared my severance pay.

o   Add to this, that I was not able to claim unemployment benefits for this time as I was effectively not terminated until the 4th of January 2022. Not really a great display of human rights for an organisation providing disability services.


In closing, I must declare that I have very little faith in my claim with the Australian Human Rights Commission going anywhere regarding the actions **REDACTED** took against me in mandating an experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure, and ultimately terminating my employment for choosing not to receive it.


Hence why my redacted correspondence is publicly available for debate and discussion among the broader community, with the hope to find a way forward to secure the inalienable human rights of all Australian’s more effectively.


Because there is ever emerging evidence that unelected global actors have been working on and looking to subvert Australia’s sovereignty and inalienable rights.



And as we have seen, Australians like me have been let down by their constitution, state and federal governments, the media, organisations like the Fair Work Commission, the judiciary, and legal systems, and even the Australian Human Rights Commission.


So, seeing our current politicians are averse to enacting a royal commission into the response to COVID and the mandating of an experimental still in trial phase mRNA gene therapy countermeasure, Australians may need to strongly consider putting in motion the drawing up a State or Federal “Bill of Rights” to protect Australians from organisational and government over reach as a result of a  “Global” Health Emergency,



or even similar emergencies (22) into the future.



Mark Neugebauer



(1) - Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety? ‑

(2) - Annexure 4 COVID-19 Correspondence - Employment Termination. -

(3) - Health minister admits public is being experimented on. -


(5) - The ten points of the Nuremberg Code -

(6) - *********REDACTED*********

(7) - *********REDACTED*********

(8) - Event 201-Flooding the Zone with a Plandemic of Lies. Social Media Known as Greatest Threat -

(9) - Were Australia's CEO's primed for the Vaccine role out by Event 201, and how much did they know? -

(10) - Pandemic response -

(11) – UDoHR Article 1 -

(12) - Annexure 1 – COVID-19 Response Correspondence to Politicians and Bureaucrats. -

(13) – Annexure 2 COVID-19 Correspondence regarding the Disability Sector. -

(14) - UDoHR Article 3 -

(15) - Security of person. (n.d.) A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier.. (1856). Retrieved August 19 2023 from

(16) - UDoHR Article 19 -

(17) - The Australian Twitter Files Australia's very own health censorship apparatus in full swing -

(18) – MAATS Method, Our Submission regarding the 'Misinformation' Bill -

(19) - Emergency Management (In-home and Community Aged Care and Disability Support Workers Vaccination) (COVID-19) Direction 2021 (“Direction”) -

(20) - Senate Speech 30 March 2022 - World Economic Forum -

(21) - Why is the World Health Organisation pushing for more power? -

(22) - South Australia has joined other governments and jurisdictions around the world in declaring a climate emergency in Parliament today. -




community logo
Join the South Australia In Focus Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
What else you may like…
Live to Love Adelaide Conference 2024

Booking -

Site -

"The purpose of the Live to Love Conference is to assemble and unite believers from various streams and denominations to petition Heaven in worship and prayer for an outpouring of encounters with the love of the Father that will change hearts, lives, families, cities, and nations."

"Very advanced, cool science I would say" - Albert Bourla, CEO Pfizer. "Safe and Effective" The verdict is still out... You decide...
Australia must fight back against Labors Orwellian Mis/Dis information Bill

"To clamp it down (speech) is the most dangerous political step any government could take, and it needs to fail" - Alex Antic

Source @adhtvaus -

An evolving list of Mark Neugebauer's Correspondence

Mark Neugebauer is now on SubStack -

1 November 2023 - Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates -

19 August 2023 - Response to the Australian Human Rights Commission, claim against employer -

11 August 2023 - Questions arising from information and discussions surrounding the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament (IVtP) -

6 August 2023 - Your encouragement to the constituents of Mawson to vote "Yes" to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - ...

Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
Email sent to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia, and Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia

Hello again interested readers.

The below email concerning the GMO court case is a follow up to an email (also further down) I sent to South Australia's Premier, Minister for Health and Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer regarding DNA Contamination in the COVID countermeasures.

The original email was inspired by an email thread from Glenn Floyd and Steve Crothers concerning DNA Contamination and WHO powers. The contents of the email thread can be found here -

If you believe my content is of benefit and you would like to support my efforts, you can do so here.



------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media

The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
I am following up as I have not heard back from you after my November 8th correspondence below, in which I requested 3 action points concerning findings of DNA contamination in the COVID 19 Countermeasures which you continue to mandate to Health Care Workers in our State.
I now add for your awareness and for public record information about legal proceedings filled against Pfizer and Moderna which is summarised by the Australian Medical Professional's Society here -
The GMO Case as it's been coined is also thoroughly covered by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister in this presentation to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int'l, and as you would appreciate due to the serious nature of the situation he doesn't pull any punches. -
Peter, Chris, and Nicole, these are truly damning revelations, not just for your ongoing insistence to mandate these countermeasures to South Australian Health Care staff, but the serious implications for yours and the previous Government for coercing and mandating the remainder of the South Australian population to take up the countermeasures. You know I have receipts showing that I have alerted yours and the previous government over the past 18 months to the concerns surrounding the countermeasures on multiple occasions.
To add more weight to these damning revelations, is the book produced by the Australian Medical Professional's Society "Too Many Dead" which I have attached to this email.
The book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. In it, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
What makes your situation worse with more information coming to light as time goes on, is that under the direction of Nicola Spurrier, vulnerable South Australians may have been medically and biologically compromised  as a direct result of the strong encouragement, coercion and mandates to take the countermeasures. This is because other government departments and non government service providers put in place policies and mechanisms to inject the elderly in aged care facilities, people living with a disability in disability services, as well as children under the guardianship of the minister as a result of Nicola's directions, and as you know I have raised many concerns to you about these vulnerable cohort.
Clearly there is nothing you can do about all of the South Australians who have taken the countermeasures to date on Nicola's advice, that ship has sailed and only time will tell if there is further legal action to be brought against anyone who coerced or forced a South Australian to take these countermeasures.
However, there is still time for you to act on point 1 of my previous email:
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers -
Peter, Chris, and Nicola, the ball is in your court, as I have yet again, hereby discharged my civic duty to my fellow Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists

------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Fw: WHO pandemic treaty - objections
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Cc: Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care.
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
You may recall that I Cc'd you into correspondence to Mr Butler on the 6th April 2023 regarding my ongoing concerns about the COVID 19 Countermeasures and the undeniable evidence that they have caused harm to the global population - The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defense! -
You may recall I raised concerns about People Living with a Disability whom I cared for prior to being terminated for choosing not to receive the Countermeasure - Annexure 2 – COVID-19 Correspondence regarding the Disability Sector -
As well as my concerns about Children, but in particular Children in Care who were bribed and coerced to take the countermeasures - Annexure 3 – COVID-19 Correspondence Regarding Children
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -

Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
Miss Spurrier, this will be of great importance to you as you sit on Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) and the Health Chief Executives Forum (HCEF) - which reports back to the Health Ministers’ Meeting (HMM) -, which Mr Picton, you are part off.
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers -
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
  • Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
  • demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
  • Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
  • Did Australia issue GMP waivers?  If so, to whom and for what?
  • How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
  • Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
  • To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
  • To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
  • To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
Read full Article
post photo preview
URGENT 🚨 The Court case submission all Australians need to be aware of. 💥
Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister – Update on the Australian GMO case


The below content is a list of 21 cuts from a November 2023 presentation by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister for Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int’l.

The full 2 hour 40 minute version can be found on Charles Kovess’s RUMBLE channel here -


I have left out the first 22 minutes of Julian covering the previous cases.

I recommend checking out Charles’s other Rumble content, as well as his TNT Radio Show segments here -


A quick intro for Julian:

Julian Gillespie is an experienced barrister, who has conducted some amazing legal work over the past few years, fighting for freedom, human rights, justice and proper application of law. He has fought to protect Australia’s children from being jabbed with the Covid injectables.

Between February and October 2023, Julian’s legal team, with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia, for failing to first obtain GMO licences from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) .. which may or may not have been granted

Julian’s legal team allege the same in the civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing).


Cut 1 – After a review of previous cases, Julian shifts the conversation to the GMO court case and obtaining approval from the donors.


Australian government, Department of health, Office of Gene Technology Regulator, AstraZeneca Covid 19 vaccine -

Gene Technology Act 2000 -



Cut 2 -  Julian provided A more detailed overview of the GMO case and who the applicant is


Julian Gillespie Substack, Australian criminal brief update -



Cut 3 - Overview of expert reports explaining and indicating the countermeasures are GMO’s.            Response from Pfizer and Moderna challenging the Australian GMO case submission based on standing. The submission has been heard, awaiting ruling from judge.




Cut 4 – Here Julian introduces Dr Bhula from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator and her significance to the case.


Link to OGTR site, what we do -



Cut 5 – Julian discusses the lead up to Dr Bhula’s grilling by Gerard Rennick and her critical own goal admission.


mRNA jabs use genetic engineering, yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 -

Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23 -



Cut 6 – Julian outlines what the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admission could mean within a properly functioning legal system, and the catastrophic consequences it would have on the Crown.




Cut 7 – Julian discusses a presentation by Dr Julie Sladden on Spectator TV and the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admissions on the Civil Proceedings.


Here is the link to the well edited presentation



Cut 8 – Julian provides an overview of the corresponding Criminal Proceedings and that the heat is on the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to act as the ball is fairly in his court.




Cut 9 - Julian believes the Government is in Damage control and political crisis meetings are happening which could be delaying a response from Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.




Cut 10 – Julian provides an overview for the critical evidence of DNA contamination for the Civil case.




Cut 11 – Julian discusses the gaslighting of Australia’s Judiciary by those in power. He provides an overview of the GMO legislation for the UK and EU. He also mentions that he has provided Christine Anderson and Andrew Brigden with a free expert legal brief for them to run with and encourages them to act upon it.


The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine -



Cut 12 – Julian provides a brief overview of GMO legislation and definitions for Canada, the US and South Africa.




Cut 13 Q & A - Charles Kovess asks, do we have a captured Judiciary?




Cut 14 – Julian indicates that the Judiciary is possibly not captured but merely victims of the information and communication units within government which are linked to the WHO.


National Health Emergency Response Arrangements -

Emergency Response Plan for Communicable Diseases of National Significance (CD Plan) -

Questions about censorship following "How Twitter rigged the COVID debate" that need to be answered by the Australian Government. (South Australia in Focus)-



Cut 15 Q & A – Stephen Frost and Julian commentary regarding genomic integration and Genetic Disorders.




Cut 16 Q & A - Stephen Frost and Julian, getting the message out via media and social media. What are the known roadblocks?


Club Grubbery -

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery -

The Vax-Gene Files: Have the Regulators Approved a Trojan Horse? -

What the shot?! Would Australians have consented if they knew the potential risks? -

Do Covid vaccines meet the definition of gene therapy? Serious questions are being asked of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator -

Rowan Dean -

Episode 224 - Part 3 - Covid Refuted You Cannot Be Serious  -



Cut 17 Q & A – Anna de Buisseret – the question of blood donations and transfusions affecting blood services and screening out unvaccinated blood. Challenging assertions about safety and the precautionary principle. Attacks via social media, the great work of @Jikkyleaks and calling out bad actors such as the #77Brigade.


Link to Anna de Buisseret’s tweet -



Cut 18 Q & A - Gerry Brady – discusses Professor Robert Langer’s 19th January YouTube video making staggering admissions regarding transfection.


The Presentation by Professor Robert Langer 19th January 2023 --  At 40:40, when asked about “Control of the 3D Fold” of the Spike Protein and the risk of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), he admits that (words to the effect) “I wish I knew more about protein folding after you get the vaccine into the cell” (!!) 


Julian discusses astounding evidence of scientists as early as March 2020 recommended nasal injected prophylactic. - Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion -



Cut 19 Q & A - Mark Steele and Julian discusse sample and testing roadblocks for the Countermeasures which may show evidence of the interconnectedness of biochemicals, nano-particulates, electromagnetic radiation fields, and 5G technology frequencies.




Cut 20 Q & A - Meike Terhorst mentions how GMO issues were flagged in the Netherlands. EU can override local state legislation in and emergency via the EMA, but there is still a requirement to address GMO issues.




Cut 21 - Closing commentary by Stephen Frost and Julian. Was there really a Pandemic?



Thank you for reading.

I will always make my content free to view, and I know a lot of quality content creators are out there and are doing the same, however if you see value in what I am doing and sharing please consider supporting my efforts for $5 month.

I often think, what could I do with an extra 40 hours per week to fight back against tyranny? It would take 1200 people who valued my efforts enough to support me and allow me the opportunity to flick the full-time job which is paying the bills.

Regardless, whatever capacity I have, I will continue to fight on and push back on the people who seek to destroy our freedoms and liberties and rule over us like little gods.

I choose to faithfully follow the one God, and proclaim, “They will be done”.


You can also follow along on:


Telegram -

Rumble -

FacistBook –

Read full Article
post photo preview
I am looking into aspects of this latest attempt to allegedly "overhaul" Child Protection in South Australia. BE VERY AFRAID!!!!
SA has had 4 decades of bureaucratic capture of Child Protection; and always with an even greater concentration of power into the hands of nameless, faceless, unaccountable elites; save under Dr Leslie Cooper, who advocated for parents (but her recommendations were ignored and overturned some 2 years later in the early 90's); Minister Martin Evans (whose recommendations were overturned just months after the roll out of "Family Preservation Model") and then Minister Stephanie Key (who was promptly removed after she showed a keen interest in holding the bureaucrats accountable. She was the only Minister to actually meet with victims face-to-face!).
Following many correspondences for a mother who had her children removed from her care of literally NOTHING, I can say the current Minister, Katrine Hildyard, is the absolute antithesis of what a responsible and accountable Minister would do in the Child Protection portfolio if "child protection" were really her end objective. IT IS NOT! She is instead covering up lies and absolutely crooked conduct by her staff and she has been caught out on tape & in writing many times now!
If there was a Globalist "Great Reset" in Child Protection, what would it look like? I propose it would look exactly like this...
"Beginning Together: Child Protection and Family Support Symposium."
It proposes a "meeting of the minds" but whose minds exactly? Not yours, or those of ordinary citizens, parents raising kids, grandparents or those caring for loved ones, and certainly not if you have been a victim (like John Ternezis)...
None of these players appear to have any "skin in the game" (e.g. never been falsely accused, lost a child due to lies by Social Workers, advocated for the return of a child to a family, etc...). The Riley Foundation (which is supposed to advocate for families) invariably tells parents "there is nothing you can do, it's all legal, the department can do what it wants" (i.e. stealing kids from families).
But what is this project really? A "top-down" capture of the entire system, to be rendered impenetrable by the ordinary citizen. Run by "experts" for "experts", concentrating power ever more in the hands of a few elites who have never advocated for a mother who has been wrongfully targeted or walked alongside a father falsely accused before having those kids ripped from their care..
QUOTE: "What’s different about this approach is that Minister Hildyard and the Expert Group will be inviting the state to consider how best to redesign the state’s child protection system – starting with a blank page."
How wonderful to know that it is "THE STATE" that is reinventing itself. What could possibly go wrong!? The State is deciding its own structure, powers of authority, mandates, terms of reference and definitions. "Starting with a blank page"? Of course! Why not? Why be constrained by laws, Codes of Ethics & Conduct and conventions of the Public Sector?
It also appears to follow much along the lines of "The Voice"... "Family Matters" are only for the ATSI community, it seems.
Chair of the South Australian Child Protection Expert Group
Now which are the NGO's that will traffick (um, err, I mean, support) the kids stolen from their families? The usual culprits which will profiteer from the misery generated. Call me cynical but I suspect the same players are already buying into the WEF/UN "Social Impact Bond", so don't be surprised if there isn't a direct link somewhere along the line.
And what do you do to celebrate the capture of more ground to "THE STATE"? You reward yourself by handing out Awards to those who helped you along the journey of course! (Yes, I know, I can't help but be cynical...)
Please start doing your own research... This is only what I can glean in a few short hours but I am pressed for time....
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals