Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
Email sent to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia, and Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
The below email concerning the GMO court case is a follow up to an email (also further down) I sent to South Australia's Premier, Minister for Health and Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer regarding DNA Contamination in the COVID countermeasures.
If you believe my content is of benefit and you would like to support my efforts, you can do so here.
------- Forwarded Message ------- From: Mark Neugebauer Date: On Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 at 3:32 PM Subject: Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected] CC: Many doctors, politicians and media
To:
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
I am following up as I have not heard back from you after my November 8th correspondence below, in which I requested 3 action points concerning findings of DNA contamination in the COVID 19 Countermeasures which you continue to mandate to Health Care Workers in our State.
Peter, Chris, and Nicole, these are truly damning revelations, not just for your ongoing insistence to mandate these countermeasures to South Australian Health Care staff, but the serious implications for yours and the previous Government for coercing and mandating the remainder of the South Australian population to take up the countermeasures. You know I have receipts showing that I have alerted yours and the previous government over the past 18 months to the concerns surrounding the countermeasures on multiple occasions.
To add more weight to these damning revelations, is the book produced by the Australian Medical Professional's Society "Too Many Dead" which I have attached to this email.
The book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. In it, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
What makes your situation worse with more information coming to light as time goes on, is that under the direction of Nicola Spurrier, vulnerable South Australians may have been medically and biologically compromised as a direct result of the strong encouragement, coercion and mandates to take the countermeasures. This is because other government departments and non government service providers put in place policies and mechanisms to inject the elderly in aged care facilities, people living with a disability in disability services, as well as children under the guardianship of the minister as a result of Nicola's directions, and as you know I have raised many concerns to you about these vulnerable cohort.
Clearly there is nothing you can do about all of the South Australians who have taken the countermeasures to date on Nicola's advice, that ship has sailed and only time will tell if there is further legal action to be brought against anyone who coerced or forced a South Australian to take these countermeasures.
However, there is still time for you to act on point 1 of my previous email:
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet https://federation.gov.au/national-cabinet/members, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
Did Australia issue GMP waivers? If so, to whom and for what?
How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
"The purpose of the Live to Love Conference is to assemble and unite believers from various streams and denominations to petition Heaven in worship and prayer for an outpouring of encounters with the love of the Father that will change hearts, lives, families, cities, and nations."
URGENT 🚨 The Court case submission all Australians need to be aware of. 💥
Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister – Update on the Australian GMO case
The below content is a list of 21 cuts from a November 2023 presentation by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister for Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int’l.
The full 2 hour 40 minute version can be found on Charles Kovess’s RUMBLE channel here -
I have left out the first 22 minutes of Julian covering the previous cases.
Julian Gillespie is an experienced barrister, who has conducted some amazing legal work over the past few years, fighting for freedom, human rights, justice and proper application of law. He has fought to protect Australia’s children from being jabbed with the Covid injectables.
Between February and October 2023, Julian’s legal team, with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia, for failing to first obtain GMO licences from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) .. which may or may not have been granted
Julian’s legal team allege the same in the civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing).
Cut 1 – After a review of previous cases, Julian shifts the conversation to the GMO court case and obtaining approval from the donors.
Cut 3 - Overview of expert reports explaining and indicating the countermeasures are GMO’s. Response from Pfizer and Moderna challenging the Australian GMO case submission based on standing. The submission has been heard, awaiting ruling from judge.
Cut 4 – Here Julian introduces Dr Bhula from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator and her significance to the case.
Cut 5 – Julian discusses the lead up to Dr Bhula’s grilling by Gerard Rennick and her critical own goal admission.
mRNA jabs use genetic engineering, yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 -
Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23 -
Cut 6 – Julian outlines what the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admission could mean within a properly functioning legal system, and the catastrophic consequences it would have on the Crown.
Cut 7 – Julian discusses a presentation by Dr Julie Sladden on Spectator TV and the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admissions on the Civil Proceedings.
Cut 8 – Julian provides an overview of the corresponding Criminal Proceedings and that the heat is on the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to act as the ball is fairly in his court.
Cut 9 - Julian believes the Government is in Damage control and political crisis meetings are happening which could be delaying a response from Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.
Cut 10 – Julian provides an overview for the critical evidence of DNA contamination for the Civil case.
Cut 11 – Julian discusses the gaslighting of Australia’s Judiciary by those in power. He provides an overview of the GMO legislation for the UK and EU. He also mentions that he has provided Christine Anderson and Andrew Brigden with a free expert legal brief for them to run with and encourages them to act upon it.
Cut 12 – Julian provides a brief overview of GMO legislation and definitions for Canada, the US and South Africa.
Cut 13 Q & A - Charles Kovess asks, do we have a captured Judiciary?
Cut 14 – Julian indicates that the Judiciary is possibly not captured but merely victims of the information and communication units within government which are linked to the WHO.
Cut 17 Q & A – Anna de Buisseret – the question of blood donations and transfusions affecting blood services and screening out unvaccinated blood. Challenging assertions about safety and the precautionary principle. Attacks via social media, the great work of @Jikkyleaks and calling out bad actors such as the #77Brigade.
Cut 18 Q & A - Gerry Brady – discusses Professor Robert Langer’s 19th January YouTube video making staggering admissions regarding transfection.
The Presentation by Professor Robert Langer 19th January 2023 -- At 40:40, when asked about “Control of the 3D Fold” of the Spike Protein and the risk of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), he admits that (words to the effect) “I wish I knew more about protein folding after you get the vaccine into the cell” (!!)
Julian discusses astounding evidence of scientists as early as March 2020 recommended nasal injected prophylactic. - Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32231345/
Cut 19 Q & A - Mark Steele and Julian discusse sample and testing roadblocks for the Countermeasures which may show evidence of the interconnectedness of biochemicals, nano-particulates, electromagnetic radiation fields, and 5G technology frequencies.
Cut 20 Q & A - Meike Terhorst mentions how GMO issues were flagged in the Netherlands. EU can override local state legislation in and emergency via the EMA, but there is still a requirement to address GMO issues.
Cut 21 - Closing commentary by Stephen Frost and Julian. Was there really a Pandemic?
Thank you for reading.
I will always make my content free to view, and I know a lot of quality content creators are out there and are doing the same, however if you see value in what I am doing and sharing please consider supporting my efforts for $5 month.
I often think, what could I do with an extra 40 hours per week to fight back against tyranny? It would take 1200 people who valued my efforts enough to support me and allow me the opportunity to flick the full-time job which is paying the bills.
Regardless, whatever capacity I have, I will continue to fight on and push back on the people who seek to destroy our freedoms and liberties and rule over us like little gods.
I choose to faithfully follow the one God, and proclaim, “They will be done”.
SA has had 4 decades of bureaucratic capture of Child Protection; and always with an even greater concentration of power into the hands of nameless, faceless, unaccountable elites; save under Dr Leslie Cooper, who advocated for parents (but her recommendations were ignored and overturned some 2 years later in the early 90's); Minister Martin Evans (whose recommendations were overturned just months after the roll out of "Family Preservation Model") and then Minister Stephanie Key (who was promptly removed after she showed a keen interest in holding the bureaucrats accountable. She was the only Minister to actually meet with victims face-to-face!).
Following many correspondences for a mother who had her children removed from her care of literally NOTHING, I can say the current Minister, Katrine Hildyard, is the absolute antithesis of what a responsible and accountable Minister would do in the Child Protection portfolio if "child protection" were really her end objective. IT IS NOT! She is instead covering up lies and absolutely crooked conduct by her staff and she has been caught out on tape & in writing many times now!
If there was a Globalist "Great Reset" in Child Protection, what would it look like?I propose it would look exactly like this...
"Beginning Together: Child Protection and Family Support Symposium."
It proposes a "meeting of the minds" but whose minds exactly? Not yours, or those of ordinary citizens, parents raising kids, grandparents or those caring for loved ones, and certainly not if you have been a victim (like John Ternezis)...
None of these players appear to have any "skin in the game" (e.g. never been falsely accused, lost a child due to lies by Social Workers, advocated for the return of a child to a family, etc...). The Riley Foundation (which is supposed to advocate for families) invariably tells parents "there is nothing you can do, it's all legal, the department can do what it wants" (i.e. stealing kids from families).
But what is this project really? A "top-down" capture of the entire system, to be rendered impenetrable by the ordinary citizen. Run by "experts" for "experts", concentrating power ever more in the hands of a few elites who have never advocated for a mother who has been wrongfully targeted or walked alongside a father falsely accused before having those kids ripped from their care..
QUOTE: "What’s different about this approach is that Minister Hildyard and the Expert Group will be inviting the state to consider how best to redesign the state’s child protection system – starting with a blank page."
How wonderful to know that it is "THE STATE" that is reinventing itself. What could possibly go wrong!? The State is deciding its own structure, powers of authority, mandates, terms of reference and definitions. "Starting with a blank page"? Of course! Why not? Why be constrained by laws, Codes of Ethics & Conduct and conventions of the Public Sector?
It also appears to follow much along the lines of "The Voice"... "Family Matters" are only for the ATSI community, it seems.
Now which are the NGO's that will traffick (um, err, I mean, support) the kids stolen from their families? The usual culprits which will profiteer from the misery generated. Call me cynical but I suspect the same players are already buying into the WEF/UN "Social Impact Bond", so don't be surprised if there isn't a direct link somewhere along the line.
And what do you do to celebrate the capture of more ground to "THE STATE"? You reward yourself by handing out Awards to those who helped you along the journey of course! (Yes, I know, I can't help but be cynical...)
Subject: OCTOBER 2023 EVIDENCE OF DEATHS/INJURY RISKS - DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response.
TO: Mark Butler Australian Minister for Health and Aged Care
CC: Elspeth Kay Branch Head HPRG-TGA Pharmacovigilance Branch
Dear Minister Butler, et al, the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested.
His findings reveal all products tested exceeded the guidelines for residual DNA set by the FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 509-fold; to a frightening 50,900% toxic risk.
Moreover, alarmingly, the Cq scores for the most recent XBB.1.5 Moderna vaccine suggest that DNA residues have not been reduced from previous vaccine versions.
These findings of dangerous life-threatening toxins in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA products must meet requisite standards of quality, safety and efficacy and/or performance before approval and are higher risk therapeutic goods, which requires rigorous scientific evaluation of data submitted with expertise from several scientific fields.
Minister, prima facie, these Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings under your existing personal Duty of Care obligations, automatically triggers a legal obligation for you and the TGA to initiate an IMMEDIATE post-market monitoring and enforcement of standards investigation on the risks now revealed.
It is damning upon ALL legislative and executive branch office holders that global all-cause mortality levels are massively exceeding five-year averages since the mRNA toxins were coerced upon all Australians in 2020; and that although these exponential increases of mortality are fully correlative to the mRNA injections; that you minister and the TGA has not initiated an in-depth investigation of these massive unexplained deaths, OR a potential causative relationship to the mRNA injections.
On behalf of all Australians minister, I request you to instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
I advise you that your offer to all Australians to participate in these experimental drugs-trials and fellow Australians’ tacit ‘CONDITIONAL’ acceptance of your offer by widespread take-up rates; establishes a legal enforceable contract under our Bills of Exchange Act 1909 (Clth.)- s5 (2); and the rules of common law, including the law merchant (Lex Mercatoria Doctrines), that binds you personally liable for deaths and injuries damages; whereby you personally MUST, under such contract obligations unequivocally prove no deaths/injuries risks whatsoever exist or have occurred.
On behalf of ALL Australians, minister Butler; we require your legal response withing five business days to our request for an immediate investigation and report on the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarming health-risks’ findings and your intended action on further experimental mRNA drugs coercion or its immediate suspension.
Kind regards
Glenn Floyd Founding Chief Executive Officer & Head of Treasury & Finance
Subject: RE: OCTOBER 2023 EVIDENCE OF DEATHS/INJURY RISKS - DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response.
TO: Mark Butler Australian Minister for Health and Aged Care
CC: Elspeth Kay Branch Head HPRG-TGA Pharmacovigilance Branch
Dear Minister Butler, et al with respect to our urgent call Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 1:26 PM for an immediate investigation and report on the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarming health-risks’ findings, the technical/quantitative/numerical results revealed, behove you (under your Oath of Office), and ministerially compel you, under legally enforceable contract definitions’ obligations under our Bills of Exchange Act 1909 (Clth.)- s5 (2); and the rules of common law, including the law merchant (Lex Mercatoria Doctrines) to demand and providefrom the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details:
A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
Kind regards
Glenn Floyd Founding Chief Executive Officer & Head of Treasury & Finance
Subject: RE: OCTOBER 2023 EVIDENCE OF DEATHS/INJURY RISKS - DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response.
TO: Mark Butler Australian Minister for Health and Aged Care
CC: Elspeth Kay Branch Head HPRG-TGA Pharmacovigilance Branch
Dear Minister Butler, et al with respect to our urgent call Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 1:26 PM for an immediate investigation and report on the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarming health-risks’ findings; the following specific evidence is IMMEDIATELY required:
Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia.
Did Australia issue GMP waivers? If so, to whom and for what?
How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
Not disclosing this precise detail requested under the alarming evidence provided now in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada published health-risks’ findings, exposes you personally potentially, to be criminally liable of concealment and misfeasance in Public Office, where criminal and civil action will be taken against you personally if you conceal any of this critical evidence Australians have a legal right to see.
The All-Cause Mortality (excluding covid-infections) numbers in Australia are approximately 15,000 per annum above the natural 5-year average, which includes may young Australians and sports people dying in their prime of life and a direct causative link is suspected to the Cov-Cyanide toxins and these utterly unnatural deaths.
Kind regards
Glenn Floyd Founding Chief Executive Officer & Head of Treasury & Finance
The Australian people said NO to the Indigenous Voice in Parliament referendum that sought to subvert the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp). It is now time to say NO to the proposed international pandemic treaty that seeks to subvert the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Australia on matters of public health. I am an Australian citizen and registered voter. I am a scientist, occupational hygienist and forensic investigator with some forty years field experience in physical, chemical and biological hazards and their management, and the investigation of injuries and fatalities in workplaces and public spaces for insurance companies and law firms.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) is an unelected foreign non-government organisation that has been given no authority by the Australian people, and is funded primarily by organisations having commercial interests feigning philanthropy. You are no doubt aware that the WHO seeks to take control of public health responses in numerous countries including Australia, in the event of any pandemic which the WHO itself can unilaterally declare upon the world. The Australian Government is soon to decide on signing a treaty to allow the WHO to dictate to the Australian people and impose upon them, with the complicity of Australian public agencies, any mandates the WHO demands in relation to WHO unilaterally declared pandemics under the proposed treaty. These broad powers for the WHO to mandate include forced medical and experimental medical procedures (including vaccinations) upon Australian citizens, incarceration of Australian citizens, suppression of open debate, control of information, restrictions on or total deprivation of freedom, liberty and movement, and denial of bodily self-determination, contrary to long-standing common law and the jurisdiction of our courts of law:
‘every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body’. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital 211 NY 125, 105 NE 92 (1914) per Justice Cadozo.
‘a man cannot be said to be truly ‘willing’ unless he is in a position to choose freely, and freedom of choice predicates, not only full knowledge of the circumstances on which the exercise of choice is conditioned, so that he may be able to choose wisely, but in the absence from his mind of any feeling of constraint so that nothing shall interfere with the freedom of his will.’ Bowater v Rowley Regis Corp [1944] KB 476 at 479 (CA) (Lord Justice Scott).
‘while evidence of acceptable medical practice is a useful guide to the courts, it is for the courts to adjudicate on what is the appropriate standard of care after giving weight to “the paramount consideration that a person is entitled to make his own decisions about his life”[F v R (1983) 33 SASR, at 193].’ Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 at 483 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Dawson, Toohey and McHugh JJ) High Court of Australia.
“it is established that the principle of self-determination requires that respect must be given to the wishes of the patient, so that if an adult patient of sound mind refuses, however unreasonably, to consent to treatment or care by which his life would or might be prolonged, the doctors responsible for his care must give effect to his wishes, even though they do not consider it to be in his best interests to do so”
Airdale National Health Service Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789; [1993] 1 All ER 821 (Lord Justice Goff of Chieveley)
‘an individual of full capacity is not obliged to give consent to medical treatment, nor is a medical practitioner or other service provider under any obligation to provide such treatment without consent, even if the failure to treat will result in the loss of the patient's life.' Brightwater Care Group (Inc) v Rossiter (2009) 40 WAR 84; [2009] WASC 229 (Martin CJ)
The Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) is a comprehensive statute that provides protection of public health and the rights of persons. The Australian people have no need or desire whatsoever for the foreign interference of the WHO. The Federal Government and its bureaucracies have not consulted the Australian electorate for the latter’s views on the proposed treaty and once again seems intent on telling the Australian people what is good for them despite the fact that Government and its public authorities are servants of the Australian people; not their despotic rulers. Federal and State governments and their agencies willingly followed the advice of the WHO and willingly applied heretofore unheard-of obscene, threatening and menacing measures in depriving Australian citizens of their civil liberties, human rights, bodily autonomy and financial independence under the guise of the alleged COVID-19 world-wide pandemic declared by the WHO. The complicity of Australian governments and their public authorities in the COVID-19 scaremongering will, in my view, result in litigation that will go on for many years, and rightly so.
I request you to oppose the proposed WHO treaty and to table before Federal Parliament this missive and the two documents attached hereto in evidence that the WHO is in reality a criminal organisation that committed fraud in relation to the alleged COVID-19 pandemic it imposed upon the world. The WHO is a dangerous and insidious organisation masquerading as a global benevolent society. The ubiquitously declared gold standard for testing any person being infected with the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID-19 is the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Although this technology is not a medical diagnostic tool at all it has been falsely represented to the public as a medical diagnostic. Now, one finds in a WHO COVID-19 coronavirus PCR testing protocol document published by the Institut Pasteur, Paris, bearing the title, ‘Protocol: Real-time RT-PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2’, this 18-character PCR primer genetic sequence (see Exhibit 1, page 1):
CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT
Exhibit 1 (page 1) states: ‘This protocol describes procedures for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 for two RdRp targets (IP2 and IP4).’ The sequence above is an RdRp gene/nCoV_IP2 bearing the specific name, nCoV_IP2-12759Rv. What the document does not say is that the above sequence is in fact a segment of chromosome 8 of human beings in the base-pair range 63,648,346 to 63,648,363 inclusive (note: 63,648,363 – 63,648,346 + 1 = 18). The said document can be obtained at this url:
Confirmation of the scientific fact that the genetic sequence above is indeed a segment of human chromosome 8 can be obtained in this document: ‘Homo sapiens chromosome 8, GRCh38.p13 Primary Assembly, NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_000008.11’ (see Exhibit 2, page 2), located at this url:
The question arises as to why the WHO includes a segment of human chromosome 8 as a SARS-CoV-2 PCR primer for the detection of COVID-19 in human beings. Theoretically, using the above genetic sequence as a PCR primer will always produce a positive RT-PCR output on a human specimen. The use of a segment of human chromosome 8 as a SARS-CoV-2 primer for PCR is fraudulent. Using the foregoing 18 character oligonucleotide amounts to ‘testing’ a human being to ascertain if that human being is a human being and if a PCR positive is returned, call it a COVID-19 case. If a PCR negative is returned that only means that the PCR result is a false negative since it is known a priori that the person ‘tested’ is a human being.
No doubt the WHO and its accomplices in the COVID-19 fraud thought that their selection of the 18 character oligonucleotide from human chromosome 8 would never be discovered by anybody. After all, one can select an 18 character string of contiguous base pairs from the 146,259,671 base pairs of human chromosome 8 in 146,259,654 different ways. Observe that starting with base pairs 1 to 18 inclusive gives 1 way; taking base pairs 2 to 19 gives another way; taking base pairs 3 to 20 gives another way; and so on up to 146,259,671 – 17 = 146,259,654 (since 146,259,671 – 146,259,654 + 1 = 18). In other words, just using human chromosome 8 alone for an 18 character base pair sequence gives 146,259,654 ways of selection. Now the haploid number of human beings is 23 (i.e. 23 chromosomes). The total number of base pairs for all the chromosomes (the genome) is about 3,054,815,472. There are therefore some 3,054,815,455 different ways to select an 18 character sequence of contiguous base pairs from the human genome and to thereby conceal its origin. In reading the WHO-Pasteur Institute document, how many people, including scientists, would observe that the 18 character oligonucleotide recommended to the world for ‘testing’ a person for COVID-19 is in fact a segment of human chromosome 8? That the offending genetic string is from the human being was quite obviously deliberately selected and concealed. No wonder the WHO miscreants and their accomplices, including its Australian co-conspirators, felt confident that their jointly commissioned crime would not be discovered. But it has been discovered because the truth will never be buried indefinitely and people not on the WHO mercenary payroll will pursue the truth and hold all the criminals to lawful account. Every Australian complicit in this fraud must in the course of time be held accountable at law and punished accordingly for their heinous crimes.
Mr. Brian Mitchell, Labor Federal Member for Lyons, writes in his article ‘Anti-corruption and integrity commission a priority’ (brianmitchell.com.au/media/articles) published in The Examiner; “The decoupling of honesty and integrity from politics and government is derailing our democracy.” Indeed; the COVID-19 fraud is an alarming case in point. In relation to the NSW public transport shutdown he wrote in that same article; “The truth emerged and the commuters went ballistic at being taken for a ride. But the increasing willingness of leaders to resort to bald-faced lies to score political points is, I believe, corrosive to democracy.” The Australian people have been taken for a ride by government and its bureaucrats who resorted to bald-faced lies about the alleged COVID-19 pandemic, corroding democracy. It is a matter to be investigated by the National Anti-Corruption and Integrity Commission.
Should you fail to table these documents before Parliament, fail to oppose the nefarious WHO treaty and fail to inform the Australian people of the facts reported to you in this correspondence, that and all else is now, nonetheless, on the public record with your office, to be pursued by those who have the lawful power to prosecute those who collaborated in the COVID-19 fraud perpetrated upon the Australian people. For the sake of transparency and democracy I have included various Australian senators and other MP's, scientists, lawyers, physicians, economists, former judges, academics and news media in this correspondence.
I have hereby discharged my civic duty to my fellow Australians.
TO: Mark Butler Australian Minister for Health and Aged Care
CC: Elspeth Kay Branch Head HPRG-TGA Pharmacovigilance Branch
Dear Minister Butler, et al with respect to Mr Stephen Crothers email (under) Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 2:12 AM), the evidence provided by Mr Crothers, prima facie, demonstrably reveals that the segment of human chromosome 8 is the offending genetic string that was deliberately chosen , and selected and concealed and only scientifically proves by the result that this is a human being; nothing else!
Viz: “The use of a segment of human chromosome 8 as a SARS-CoV-2 primer for PCR is fraudulent. Using the foregoing 18 character oligonucleotide amounts to ‘testing’ a human being to ascertain if that human being is a human being and if a PCR positive is returned, call it a COVID-19 case. If a PCR negative is returned that only means that the PCR result is a false negative since it is known a priori that the person ‘tested’ is a human being”.
As revealed by the intelligence of all Australians whereby your party leader has Lost-His-‘Voice’ (campaign) with an absolute rejection of racist-card playing manipulation, the profound awareness is also now upon all Australians that you, your government and ALL major parties may be utterly bribery-corruption (donations) captured by the Pharma-Mafia Cabal that pays your wages via donations whereby the Cov-Cyanide you are pushing is probably causing 15,000 excess Australia deaths per annum and now sees a 97% vaccine rejection by Australians duped by prima facie initial possible WHO collaborative misfeasance.
Mr. Crothers’ concise irrefutable scientific evidence demonstrably shows the fundamental faux-science drivel used the proposed WHO international pandemic treaty seeks to subvert the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Australia on matters of public health, and again its financial $Multi-Trillion-Dollar backers are the same criminals funding you (donations?) and ALL Australian major parties.
Mr. Crothers’ concise irrefutable scientific evidence does not just show the WHO fundamental faux-science drivel is false, and cannot be relied upon; the evidence reveals a terrifying criminal fraud of manipulated science, but prima facie, also a brazen attempt to continue the political capture that made ALL major party politicians automatic as Sock-Puppets in dire collusion with the Pharma-Industrial-Complex.
You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption. Please respond to this email on your willingness to investigate this serious matter within five (5) working days.
Kind regards
Glenn Floyd Founding Chief Executive Officer & Head of Treasury & Finance
Misfeasance in public office is a 'very peculiar' legal wrong and the only 'public' tort; while all other torts concern private wrongdoing, misfeasance creates liability for public officers themselves who misuse their public power in bad faith and cause harm.
Notwithstanding any results that may come from investigations we have requested you to undertake (under); refusal to respond at all as requested; in itself constitutes Misfeasance in Public Office.
Kind regards
Glenn Floyd Founding Chief Executive Officer & Head of Treasury & Finance
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet https://federation.gov.au/national-cabinet/members, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
Did Australia issue GMP waivers? If so, to whom and for what?
How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
Sign Up for free to see more from this community or subscribe to South Australia In Focus for $5/month to support Mark Neugebauer for more interaction and exclusive content.