South Australia In Focus
Lifestyle • Politics • Culture
News and current affairs with a focus on South Australia, with a National and International overview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.

From: erich.neug [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected], 'Jennifer Squires'<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Health:Minister for Health<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Tony Nikolic<[email protected]>, Rennick, Gerard (Senator)<[email protected]>, [email protected], Roberts, Malcolm (Senator)<[email protected]>, Game, Jennifer (Sen P. Hanson)<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 1:13 PM

Katrine Hildyard, Minister for Child Protection, South Australian Government. - [email protected]
Regarding: Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.

Dear Katrine,

I am following up on nearly 2 years of correspondence sent to Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats, including yourself, raising concerns about the countermeasures deployed by both the State and Federal government, particularly regarding children (Attached).

I write to you today, again publicly, in light off a recent letter sent by the Australian Medical Professional’s Society (AMPS) to Dr Brendan Murphy, Secretary of the Department of Health found here -

As always, I encourage you to read the whole letter to gain a full understanding of AMPS position and where I am coming from with my concerns, however I will quote some sections of the letter to set up for the very important questions I will raise further down.

Children are at near zero risk of serious or long-term health outcomes and death from the disease know as COVID-19, as was already known over 12 months ago (, but this from the AMPS letter:
“As outlined by ATAGI, most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness. Those who are symptomatic typically have a short illness with a median duration of 5 days[12][13]. Research findings demonstrate that children clear the virus more easily than adults and generate a robust, cross-reactive and sustained immune response to SARS-CoV-2.[14][15]This is especially true since the arrival of the Omicron variant, where clinical evidence suggests infections and their associated symptoms have been generally milder with data showing minimal risk posed to children, including those under 5[16][17]. Additionally, the most recent Paediatric SARS-CoV-2 Serosurvey 2022 Australia Summary Report clearly evidences most children and adolescents in Australia have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2, with low rates of hospitalisations[18].
“Data from the Australian government department of Health Website: Coronavirus (COVID-19) case numbers and statistics updated in May 2022 demonstrate a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 0.0428% for all age groups, with a recent study outlining Children 0-19 years experience an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.0003%[19]. Confirming this peer-reviewed literature is the complete absence of any Australian data able to demonstrate any healthy child has died as a direct result of Covid[20].”
“A Johns Hopkins study published in July 2021 monitored 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID-19 and found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition[22]. Additionally, a study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death[23] from SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, a recent nationwide Icelandic study[24] of Covid-19 infections in children showed after three waves of infection, including the more severe Delta variant, no Icelandic child required hospitalisation, proving again Covid-19 is not life-threatening to children, nor does it cause serious debilitating outcomes in those children infected. Overall statistics show that the risk of death or serious debilitating conditions, especially in healthy children, is essentially statistically nil[25].”

Regarding efficacy, AMPS states:
“The clinical data used to support both AusPAR outcome recommendations are lacking or missing. The reports clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent coronavirus and therefore do not meet the indication for which they have been approved[33].
In children another study from New York demonstrated the rapidly waning efficacy against the omicron variant, falling to 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post the second dose.[34] Similar findings to the New York study were noted in the Pfizer 0-4s trial with the efficacy after the first 2 doses falling to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After the addition of a third dose for young children there were evidence to suggest efficacy from 7-30 days, but there was no data beyond 30 days to demonstrate any ongoing efficacy, waning timeframes or whether negative efficacy developed.[35]Such flawed findings cannot compete with natural immunity against Covid-19 re-infection, as recent studies[36] have clearly proved.”

But most concerning off all, and the main basis for my questions to you, with the hope you will investigate these further, relate to safety:
“….Instead AMPS impresses upon the Secretary of Health the obvious need to responsibly take into account the vast and unprecedented body of scientific research amassed over the last 18 months evidencing many adverse and crippling outcomes from these vaccines.[41]
Globally there is great concern about myocarditis[42][43] associated with these injections in young people, which is sadly but one of the many life-limiting adverse reactions found to be associated with these vaccines[44][45][46].
Within the age group <1-11 years old the following are some of the adverse reactions reported; death, chest pain, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, vaginal haemorrhage, Kawasaki disease, Bell's palsy, tinnitus, Ginnotti-Crosti syndrome, thrombocytopenia, seizure, and transverse myelitis.
There are now more than a thousand peer-reviewed studies evidencing adverse effects post COVID vaccination[47]. Severe reactions, many involving lifelong harms, are still yet to be properly quantified by public health officials; this brings about an extraordinary state of affairs that calls for the strictest application of the Precautionary Principle in respect of our youngest and most vulnerable children[48]. Extreme caution is required now that it is known there is minimal risk posed to children from SARS-CoV-2.
Prior claims Covid-19 infection leads to increased myocarditis and pericarditis have been found untrue.[49] In fact, it has been shown that Covid-19 vaccination is causing substantial rates of myocarditis and pericarditis[50].
Animal biodistribution studies showed the lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes,[51] with added concern now data are demonstrating that mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines can be reverse-transcribed[52].
It is also critically important to be aware of the as-yet unknown effects on young children’s developing immune systems from these novel gene-based drugs. The tiny number of participants in the trial makes it impossible to rule out potential adverse outcomes such as antibody-dependent enhancement, the unanswered question of original antigenic sin, and the possibility of developing impaired immune function[53][54][55].”

As mentioned, I encourage you to read the whole letter, but I trust you understand my position based on the entirety of my previous correspondence as well as this comprehensive letter formulated by AMPS.

So, bearing in mind all our obligations regarding mandated notifications, which I have pointed out in my numerous correspondences, namely:
"Forming a suspicion on reasonable grounds, A mandated notifier must make a report to the Department for Child Protection
if they suspect on reasonable grounds that a child or young person is, or may be, at risk of harm. A mandated notifier does not
have to be able to p rove that harm has actually occurred."

"Failing to report, A failure by a mandated notifier to report a suspicion formed on reasonable grounds that a child or young
person is, or may be at risk may result in a person being prosecuted and a court imposing a fine. See section 31(1) of the
Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017"

"A mandated notifier who reports a suspicion in accordance with the Act cannot be held to have breached any code of
professional etiquette or ethics, or to have departed from any acceptable form of professional conduct (section 166(4) of
the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017)".

Here are my questions:

1. As I have been made aware this occurred, will you investigate if any child under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection was strongly encouraged, bribed or coerced to receive any dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine and report the findings?
2. Were all children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered?
3. Were all cares/guardians for children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered to the children under their care?
4. Does the Department for Child Protection (DCP) have a full and comprehensive readily accessible records of all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received one or more doses of COVID-19 Vaccines?
5. Does this readily available record contain information relating to the Vaccine product received and on what date/s?
6. As the DCP have been alerted by me since October 2021, about concerns surrounding safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, has the DCP put in place any ongoing health monitoring mechanisms for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 Vaccine/s?
7. Does the DCP maintain records for any child under the guardianship of the Minister who has received a COVID-19 Vaccine and HAS had an adverse event, ongoing health concerns or has died after receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine?
8. What mechanisms are in place for the DCP to maintain long term records for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 vaccine/s for possible future reparations?
9. Has the DCP considered that a fund may need to be set up to cover the cost of future reparations, considering the mounting evidence of what’s currently known about the safety concerns of the COVID-19 vaccines, and the lack of long-term safety data available as per traditional immunisation products?

I look forward to your response.

Mark Neugebauer
23rd February 2023

1.62 MB 2 files attached (Ongoing emerging information and data regarding VOVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.pdf 221.22 KB) (Annexure 3_Children.pdf 1.40 MB)

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Live to Love Adelaide Conference 2024

Booking -

Site -

"The purpose of the Live to Love Conference is to assemble and unite believers from various streams and denominations to petition Heaven in worship and prayer for an outpouring of encounters with the love of the Father that will change hearts, lives, families, cities, and nations."

"Very advanced, cool science I would say" - Albert Bourla, CEO Pfizer. "Safe and Effective" The verdict is still out... You decide...
Australia must fight back against Labors Orwellian Mis/Dis information Bill

"To clamp it down (speech) is the most dangerous political step any government could take, and it needs to fail" - Alex Antic

Source @adhtvaus -

An evolving list of Mark Neugebauer's Correspondence

Mark Neugebauer is now on SubStack -

1 November 2023 - Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates -

19 August 2023 - Response to the Australian Human Rights Commission, claim against employer -

11 August 2023 - Questions arising from information and discussions surrounding the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament (IVtP) -

6 August 2023 - Your encouragement to the constituents of Mawson to vote "Yes" to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - ...

Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
Email sent to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia, and Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia

Hello again interested readers.

The below email concerning the GMO court case is a follow up to an email (also further down) I sent to South Australia's Premier, Minister for Health and Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer regarding DNA Contamination in the COVID countermeasures.

The original email was inspired by an email thread from Glenn Floyd and Steve Crothers concerning DNA Contamination and WHO powers. The contents of the email thread can be found here -

If you believe my content is of benefit and you would like to support my efforts, you can do so here.



------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media

The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
I am following up as I have not heard back from you after my November 8th correspondence below, in which I requested 3 action points concerning findings of DNA contamination in the COVID 19 Countermeasures which you continue to mandate to Health Care Workers in our State.
I now add for your awareness and for public record information about legal proceedings filled against Pfizer and Moderna which is summarised by the Australian Medical Professional's Society here -
The GMO Case as it's been coined is also thoroughly covered by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister in this presentation to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int'l, and as you would appreciate due to the serious nature of the situation he doesn't pull any punches. -
Peter, Chris, and Nicole, these are truly damning revelations, not just for your ongoing insistence to mandate these countermeasures to South Australian Health Care staff, but the serious implications for yours and the previous Government for coercing and mandating the remainder of the South Australian population to take up the countermeasures. You know I have receipts showing that I have alerted yours and the previous government over the past 18 months to the concerns surrounding the countermeasures on multiple occasions.
To add more weight to these damning revelations, is the book produced by the Australian Medical Professional's Society "Too Many Dead" which I have attached to this email.
The book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. In it, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
What makes your situation worse with more information coming to light as time goes on, is that under the direction of Nicola Spurrier, vulnerable South Australians may have been medically and biologically compromised  as a direct result of the strong encouragement, coercion and mandates to take the countermeasures. This is because other government departments and non government service providers put in place policies and mechanisms to inject the elderly in aged care facilities, people living with a disability in disability services, as well as children under the guardianship of the minister as a result of Nicola's directions, and as you know I have raised many concerns to you about these vulnerable cohort.
Clearly there is nothing you can do about all of the South Australians who have taken the countermeasures to date on Nicola's advice, that ship has sailed and only time will tell if there is further legal action to be brought against anyone who coerced or forced a South Australian to take these countermeasures.
However, there is still time for you to act on point 1 of my previous email:
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers -
Peter, Chris, and Nicola, the ball is in your court, as I have yet again, hereby discharged my civic duty to my fellow Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists

------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Fw: WHO pandemic treaty - objections
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Cc: Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care.
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
You may recall that I Cc'd you into correspondence to Mr Butler on the 6th April 2023 regarding my ongoing concerns about the COVID 19 Countermeasures and the undeniable evidence that they have caused harm to the global population - The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defense! -
You may recall I raised concerns about People Living with a Disability whom I cared for prior to being terminated for choosing not to receive the Countermeasure - Annexure 2 – COVID-19 Correspondence regarding the Disability Sector -
As well as my concerns about Children, but in particular Children in Care who were bribed and coerced to take the countermeasures - Annexure 3 – COVID-19 Correspondence Regarding Children
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -

Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
Miss Spurrier, this will be of great importance to you as you sit on Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) and the Health Chief Executives Forum (HCEF) - which reports back to the Health Ministers’ Meeting (HMM) -, which Mr Picton, you are part off.
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers -
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
  • Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
  • demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
  • Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
  • Did Australia issue GMP waivers?  If so, to whom and for what?
  • How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
  • Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
  • To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
  • To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
  • To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
Read full Article
post photo preview
URGENT 🚨 The Court case submission all Australians need to be aware of. 💥
Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister – Update on the Australian GMO case


The below content is a list of 21 cuts from a November 2023 presentation by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister for Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int’l.

The full 2 hour 40 minute version can be found on Charles Kovess’s RUMBLE channel here -


I have left out the first 22 minutes of Julian covering the previous cases.

I recommend checking out Charles’s other Rumble content, as well as his TNT Radio Show segments here -


A quick intro for Julian:

Julian Gillespie is an experienced barrister, who has conducted some amazing legal work over the past few years, fighting for freedom, human rights, justice and proper application of law. He has fought to protect Australia’s children from being jabbed with the Covid injectables.

Between February and October 2023, Julian’s legal team, with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia, for failing to first obtain GMO licences from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) .. which may or may not have been granted

Julian’s legal team allege the same in the civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing).


Cut 1 – After a review of previous cases, Julian shifts the conversation to the GMO court case and obtaining approval from the donors.


Australian government, Department of health, Office of Gene Technology Regulator, AstraZeneca Covid 19 vaccine -

Gene Technology Act 2000 -



Cut 2 -  Julian provided A more detailed overview of the GMO case and who the applicant is


Julian Gillespie Substack, Australian criminal brief update -



Cut 3 - Overview of expert reports explaining and indicating the countermeasures are GMO’s.            Response from Pfizer and Moderna challenging the Australian GMO case submission based on standing. The submission has been heard, awaiting ruling from judge.




Cut 4 – Here Julian introduces Dr Bhula from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator and her significance to the case.


Link to OGTR site, what we do -



Cut 5 – Julian discusses the lead up to Dr Bhula’s grilling by Gerard Rennick and her critical own goal admission.


mRNA jabs use genetic engineering, yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 -

Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23 -



Cut 6 – Julian outlines what the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admission could mean within a properly functioning legal system, and the catastrophic consequences it would have on the Crown.




Cut 7 – Julian discusses a presentation by Dr Julie Sladden on Spectator TV and the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admissions on the Civil Proceedings.


Here is the link to the well edited presentation



Cut 8 – Julian provides an overview of the corresponding Criminal Proceedings and that the heat is on the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to act as the ball is fairly in his court.




Cut 9 - Julian believes the Government is in Damage control and political crisis meetings are happening which could be delaying a response from Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.




Cut 10 – Julian provides an overview for the critical evidence of DNA contamination for the Civil case.




Cut 11 – Julian discusses the gaslighting of Australia’s Judiciary by those in power. He provides an overview of the GMO legislation for the UK and EU. He also mentions that he has provided Christine Anderson and Andrew Brigden with a free expert legal brief for them to run with and encourages them to act upon it.


The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine -



Cut 12 – Julian provides a brief overview of GMO legislation and definitions for Canada, the US and South Africa.




Cut 13 Q & A - Charles Kovess asks, do we have a captured Judiciary?




Cut 14 – Julian indicates that the Judiciary is possibly not captured but merely victims of the information and communication units within government which are linked to the WHO.


National Health Emergency Response Arrangements -

Emergency Response Plan for Communicable Diseases of National Significance (CD Plan) -

Questions about censorship following "How Twitter rigged the COVID debate" that need to be answered by the Australian Government. (South Australia in Focus)-



Cut 15 Q & A – Stephen Frost and Julian commentary regarding genomic integration and Genetic Disorders.




Cut 16 Q & A - Stephen Frost and Julian, getting the message out via media and social media. What are the known roadblocks?


Club Grubbery -

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery -

The Vax-Gene Files: Have the Regulators Approved a Trojan Horse? -

What the shot?! Would Australians have consented if they knew the potential risks? -

Do Covid vaccines meet the definition of gene therapy? Serious questions are being asked of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator -

Rowan Dean -

Episode 224 - Part 3 - Covid Refuted You Cannot Be Serious  -



Cut 17 Q & A – Anna de Buisseret – the question of blood donations and transfusions affecting blood services and screening out unvaccinated blood. Challenging assertions about safety and the precautionary principle. Attacks via social media, the great work of @Jikkyleaks and calling out bad actors such as the #77Brigade.


Link to Anna de Buisseret’s tweet -



Cut 18 Q & A - Gerry Brady – discusses Professor Robert Langer’s 19th January YouTube video making staggering admissions regarding transfection.


The Presentation by Professor Robert Langer 19th January 2023 --  At 40:40, when asked about “Control of the 3D Fold” of the Spike Protein and the risk of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), he admits that (words to the effect) “I wish I knew more about protein folding after you get the vaccine into the cell” (!!) 


Julian discusses astounding evidence of scientists as early as March 2020 recommended nasal injected prophylactic. - Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion -



Cut 19 Q & A - Mark Steele and Julian discusse sample and testing roadblocks for the Countermeasures which may show evidence of the interconnectedness of biochemicals, nano-particulates, electromagnetic radiation fields, and 5G technology frequencies.




Cut 20 Q & A - Meike Terhorst mentions how GMO issues were flagged in the Netherlands. EU can override local state legislation in and emergency via the EMA, but there is still a requirement to address GMO issues.




Cut 21 - Closing commentary by Stephen Frost and Julian. Was there really a Pandemic?



Thank you for reading.

I will always make my content free to view, and I know a lot of quality content creators are out there and are doing the same, however if you see value in what I am doing and sharing please consider supporting my efforts for $5 month.

I often think, what could I do with an extra 40 hours per week to fight back against tyranny? It would take 1200 people who valued my efforts enough to support me and allow me the opportunity to flick the full-time job which is paying the bills.

Regardless, whatever capacity I have, I will continue to fight on and push back on the people who seek to destroy our freedoms and liberties and rule over us like little gods.

I choose to faithfully follow the one God, and proclaim, “They will be done”.


You can also follow along on:


Telegram -

Rumble -

FacistBook –

Read full Article
post photo preview
I am looking into aspects of this latest attempt to allegedly "overhaul" Child Protection in South Australia. BE VERY AFRAID!!!!
SA has had 4 decades of bureaucratic capture of Child Protection; and always with an even greater concentration of power into the hands of nameless, faceless, unaccountable elites; save under Dr Leslie Cooper, who advocated for parents (but her recommendations were ignored and overturned some 2 years later in the early 90's); Minister Martin Evans (whose recommendations were overturned just months after the roll out of "Family Preservation Model") and then Minister Stephanie Key (who was promptly removed after she showed a keen interest in holding the bureaucrats accountable. She was the only Minister to actually meet with victims face-to-face!).
Following many correspondences for a mother who had her children removed from her care of literally NOTHING, I can say the current Minister, Katrine Hildyard, is the absolute antithesis of what a responsible and accountable Minister would do in the Child Protection portfolio if "child protection" were really her end objective. IT IS NOT! She is instead covering up lies and absolutely crooked conduct by her staff and she has been caught out on tape & in writing many times now!
If there was a Globalist "Great Reset" in Child Protection, what would it look like? I propose it would look exactly like this...
"Beginning Together: Child Protection and Family Support Symposium."
It proposes a "meeting of the minds" but whose minds exactly? Not yours, or those of ordinary citizens, parents raising kids, grandparents or those caring for loved ones, and certainly not if you have been a victim (like John Ternezis)...
None of these players appear to have any "skin in the game" (e.g. never been falsely accused, lost a child due to lies by Social Workers, advocated for the return of a child to a family, etc...). The Riley Foundation (which is supposed to advocate for families) invariably tells parents "there is nothing you can do, it's all legal, the department can do what it wants" (i.e. stealing kids from families).
But what is this project really? A "top-down" capture of the entire system, to be rendered impenetrable by the ordinary citizen. Run by "experts" for "experts", concentrating power ever more in the hands of a few elites who have never advocated for a mother who has been wrongfully targeted or walked alongside a father falsely accused before having those kids ripped from their care..
QUOTE: "What’s different about this approach is that Minister Hildyard and the Expert Group will be inviting the state to consider how best to redesign the state’s child protection system – starting with a blank page."
How wonderful to know that it is "THE STATE" that is reinventing itself. What could possibly go wrong!? The State is deciding its own structure, powers of authority, mandates, terms of reference and definitions. "Starting with a blank page"? Of course! Why not? Why be constrained by laws, Codes of Ethics & Conduct and conventions of the Public Sector?
It also appears to follow much along the lines of "The Voice"... "Family Matters" are only for the ATSI community, it seems.
Chair of the South Australian Child Protection Expert Group
Now which are the NGO's that will traffick (um, err, I mean, support) the kids stolen from their families? The usual culprits which will profiteer from the misery generated. Call me cynical but I suspect the same players are already buying into the WEF/UN "Social Impact Bond", so don't be surprised if there isn't a direct link somewhere along the line.
And what do you do to celebrate the capture of more ground to "THE STATE"? You reward yourself by handing out Awards to those who helped you along the journey of course! (Yes, I know, I can't help but be cynical...)
Please start doing your own research... This is only what I can glean in a few short hours but I am pressed for time....
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals