South Australia In Focus
Lifestyle • Politics • Culture
News and current affairs with a focus on South Australia, with a National and International overview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.

From: erich.neug [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected], 'Jennifer Squires'<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Health:Minister for Health<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Tony Nikolic<[email protected]>, Rennick, Gerard (Senator)<[email protected]>, [email protected], Roberts, Malcolm (Senator)<[email protected]>, Game, Jennifer (Sen P. Hanson)<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 1:13 PM

Katrine Hildyard, Minister for Child Protection, South Australian Government. - [email protected]
Regarding: Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.

Dear Katrine,

I am following up on nearly 2 years of correspondence sent to Australia’s politicians and bureaucrats, including yourself, raising concerns about the countermeasures deployed by both the State and Federal government, particularly regarding children (Attached).

I write to you today, again publicly, in light off a recent letter sent by the Australian Medical Professional’s Society (AMPS) to Dr Brendan Murphy, Secretary of the Department of Health found here -

As always, I encourage you to read the whole letter to gain a full understanding of AMPS position and where I am coming from with my concerns, however I will quote some sections of the letter to set up for the very important questions I will raise further down.

Children are at near zero risk of serious or long-term health outcomes and death from the disease know as COVID-19, as was already known over 12 months ago (, but this from the AMPS letter:
“As outlined by ATAGI, most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness. Those who are symptomatic typically have a short illness with a median duration of 5 days[12][13]. Research findings demonstrate that children clear the virus more easily than adults and generate a robust, cross-reactive and sustained immune response to SARS-CoV-2.[14][15]This is especially true since the arrival of the Omicron variant, where clinical evidence suggests infections and their associated symptoms have been generally milder with data showing minimal risk posed to children, including those under 5[16][17]. Additionally, the most recent Paediatric SARS-CoV-2 Serosurvey 2022 Australia Summary Report clearly evidences most children and adolescents in Australia have been infected with the SARS-CoV-2, with low rates of hospitalisations[18].
“Data from the Australian government department of Health Website: Coronavirus (COVID-19) case numbers and statistics updated in May 2022 demonstrate a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 0.0428% for all age groups, with a recent study outlining Children 0-19 years experience an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.0003%[19]. Confirming this peer-reviewed literature is the complete absence of any Australian data able to demonstrate any healthy child has died as a direct result of Covid[20].”
“A Johns Hopkins study published in July 2021 monitored 48,000 children diagnosed with COVID-19 and found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition[22]. Additionally, a study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death[23] from SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, a recent nationwide Icelandic study[24] of Covid-19 infections in children showed after three waves of infection, including the more severe Delta variant, no Icelandic child required hospitalisation, proving again Covid-19 is not life-threatening to children, nor does it cause serious debilitating outcomes in those children infected. Overall statistics show that the risk of death or serious debilitating conditions, especially in healthy children, is essentially statistically nil[25].”

Regarding efficacy, AMPS states:
“The clinical data used to support both AusPAR outcome recommendations are lacking or missing. The reports clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent coronavirus and therefore do not meet the indication for which they have been approved[33].
In children another study from New York demonstrated the rapidly waning efficacy against the omicron variant, falling to 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post the second dose.[34] Similar findings to the New York study were noted in the Pfizer 0-4s trial with the efficacy after the first 2 doses falling to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After the addition of a third dose for young children there were evidence to suggest efficacy from 7-30 days, but there was no data beyond 30 days to demonstrate any ongoing efficacy, waning timeframes or whether negative efficacy developed.[35]Such flawed findings cannot compete with natural immunity against Covid-19 re-infection, as recent studies[36] have clearly proved.”

But most concerning off all, and the main basis for my questions to you, with the hope you will investigate these further, relate to safety:
“….Instead AMPS impresses upon the Secretary of Health the obvious need to responsibly take into account the vast and unprecedented body of scientific research amassed over the last 18 months evidencing many adverse and crippling outcomes from these vaccines.[41]
Globally there is great concern about myocarditis[42][43] associated with these injections in young people, which is sadly but one of the many life-limiting adverse reactions found to be associated with these vaccines[44][45][46].
Within the age group <1-11 years old the following are some of the adverse reactions reported; death, chest pain, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, pericarditis, stroke, vaginal haemorrhage, Kawasaki disease, Bell's palsy, tinnitus, Ginnotti-Crosti syndrome, thrombocytopenia, seizure, and transverse myelitis.
There are now more than a thousand peer-reviewed studies evidencing adverse effects post COVID vaccination[47]. Severe reactions, many involving lifelong harms, are still yet to be properly quantified by public health officials; this brings about an extraordinary state of affairs that calls for the strictest application of the Precautionary Principle in respect of our youngest and most vulnerable children[48]. Extreme caution is required now that it is known there is minimal risk posed to children from SARS-CoV-2.
Prior claims Covid-19 infection leads to increased myocarditis and pericarditis have been found untrue.[49] In fact, it has been shown that Covid-19 vaccination is causing substantial rates of myocarditis and pericarditis[50].
Animal biodistribution studies showed the lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes,[51] with added concern now data are demonstrating that mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines can be reverse-transcribed[52].
It is also critically important to be aware of the as-yet unknown effects on young children’s developing immune systems from these novel gene-based drugs. The tiny number of participants in the trial makes it impossible to rule out potential adverse outcomes such as antibody-dependent enhancement, the unanswered question of original antigenic sin, and the possibility of developing impaired immune function[53][54][55].”

As mentioned, I encourage you to read the whole letter, but I trust you understand my position based on the entirety of my previous correspondence as well as this comprehensive letter formulated by AMPS.

So, bearing in mind all our obligations regarding mandated notifications, which I have pointed out in my numerous correspondences, namely:
"Forming a suspicion on reasonable grounds, A mandated notifier must make a report to the Department for Child Protection
if they suspect on reasonable grounds that a child or young person is, or may be, at risk of harm. A mandated notifier does not
have to be able to p rove that harm has actually occurred."

"Failing to report, A failure by a mandated notifier to report a suspicion formed on reasonable grounds that a child or young
person is, or may be at risk may result in a person being prosecuted and a court imposing a fine. See section 31(1) of the
Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017"

"A mandated notifier who reports a suspicion in accordance with the Act cannot be held to have breached any code of
professional etiquette or ethics, or to have departed from any acceptable form of professional conduct (section 166(4) of
the Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017)".

Here are my questions:

1. As I have been made aware this occurred, will you investigate if any child under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection was strongly encouraged, bribed or coerced to receive any dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine and report the findings?
2. Were all children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered?
3. Were all cares/guardians for children under the guardianship of the Minister for Child Protection made fully aware of all the possible adverse events associated with the approved COVID-19 Vaccines, prior to them being administered to the children under their care?
4. Does the Department for Child Protection (DCP) have a full and comprehensive readily accessible records of all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received one or more doses of COVID-19 Vaccines?
5. Does this readily available record contain information relating to the Vaccine product received and on what date/s?
6. As the DCP have been alerted by me since October 2021, about concerns surrounding safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, has the DCP put in place any ongoing health monitoring mechanisms for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 Vaccine/s?
7. Does the DCP maintain records for any child under the guardianship of the Minister who has received a COVID-19 Vaccine and HAS had an adverse event, ongoing health concerns or has died after receiving a COVID-19 Vaccine?
8. What mechanisms are in place for the DCP to maintain long term records for all children under the guardianship of the Minister who have received the COVID-19 vaccine/s for possible future reparations?
9. Has the DCP considered that a fund may need to be set up to cover the cost of future reparations, considering the mounting evidence of what’s currently known about the safety concerns of the COVID-19 vaccines, and the lack of long-term safety data available as per traditional immunisation products?

I look forward to your response.

Mark Neugebauer
23rd February 2023

1.62 MB 2 files attached (Ongoing emerging information and data regarding VOVID-19 Vaccine harm in children.pdf 221.22 KB) (Annexure 3_Children.pdf 1.40 MB)

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
“Crossroads” The WHOs promotion of CSE

Time to #ExitTheWho #ExitTheUN #ExitTheWEF
Comprehensive Sexuality Education
Put together by a friend, who is an extremely concerned father and grandfather.

Shocked mother warns the world - The indoctrination of our children continues. -

🚨 Forest of the Fallen South Australia 🚨 🚨 Including CHILDREN 🚨

How many more children will be added to displays like this around the country 🇦🇺 before more people stand up and our politicians and bureaucrats are held to account?

Website to The Forest of the Fallen -

Kate Mason's first attempt at raising concerns at Central Coast Council - many more to come.

We all must do more to push back on centralisation and globalisation of our councils.

Thank you Kate Mason ( for your bravery and giving a voice to the constituents in your council electorate.

An evolving list of Mark Neugebauer's Correspondence

6 April 2023 - Re: – The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defence! -

22 February 2023 - Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children. -

21 January 2023 - South Australia’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency. (DCE). -

29 December 2022 - Questions about censorship following "How Twitter rigged the COVID
debate" that need to be answered by the Australian Government. - ...

"FOREST OF THE FALLEN" visual display.

HELPERS WANTED : late notice (I know, right. I was waiting to see the weather forecast 😊💜).

"FOREST OF THE FALLEN" visual display.

Saturday 3rd June
9am-3pm (approx)
Wanting confirmed helpers (minimum 3 people always).

NOTE : this is a SILENT & PEACEFUL DISPLAY, sharing testimonies of the Jab Injured, & deceased. We are aiming to encourage curiosity, rather than attempting confrontation.

exact location TBA

Help is for setting up display at 9am, perhaps staying for a bit, or even all day if you can. Weather is going to be about 19°.

These displays are

Many hands make light work.

Contact Loraine
[email protected]

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery

Contribution from Julian Gillespie

Some many of you may have come across the below recently .. many will have not

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery -

"If McKernan’s findings are verified, the implications are serious. Widespread DNA contamination
would bring into question the quality of the entire #mRNA injection manufacturing process,
safety systems, and regulatory oversight."

.. over the past several days the article has generated over 800K views with shares and reposts on twitter .. twitter folk are not happy -

and not a single regulator or mainstream news outlet wishes to comment or pick up this frightening data .. but heck, only the human genome, right

many comments across social media question the extent of contamination across the many batches released by Pfizer and Moderna globally

Kevin McKernan appears to have received his bivalent samples, and later monovalent sample, ...

post photo preview
The Australian Twitter Files
Australia's very own health censorship apparatus in full swing


With the 🇦🇺 #AusTwitterFiles on censorship gaining traction with Senator Alex Antic's revelation from a recent freedom of information request, I encourage all who have an investigative mind to dig further into any conflicts of interest and links to global corporatist entities by the ATAGI and the TGA. 



I recently wrote to Brendan Murphy and Mark Butler with my ongoing concerns about COVID19 Countermeasures and Children (especially those in care)


Link 👇


In the response received by Dr Grant Pegg, Principal Medical Advisor, Pharmacovigilance Branch, Health Products Regulation Group, he passed the buck (they do this a lot) to ATAGI and TGA


Link 👇

So, with @mtaibbi and @NAffects confirming the relationship between Twitter 1.0 and the Department of Home Affairs.


Link 👇


Link 👇

In @SenatorAntic recent cross examination of the Dept. of Home Affairs, they confirmed that they are not responsible for determining the reason they should request the removal of content from social media platforms but are acting on the “expert advice from the Department of Health”.


Link 👇


I had already writen a letter requesting if Australia’s government had been involved in censorship as exposed by the original #TwitterFiles 


Link 👇


In their reply, they fobbed me off, and as we have now come to understand, knowing full well they were giving "expert advice” to the Department of Home Affairs to censor Australian social media accounts.


Link 👇


So, now that we know the Department of Health is directing the Department of Home affairs to censor Australians on COVID related conversations, but the Department of Health is receiving their expert advice from ATAGI and the TGA.

Who is the main driver behind censoring critical information and debate?

We now know that the AHPRA censored Australian doctors for recommending early treatment protocols and against any concerns they might have had regarding the COVID-19 countermeasures, so as not to “undermine” the roll out.


Link 👇


And as we’ve found out from a letter sent to suspended Dr William Bay, “AHPRA acts independently to the Australian Government. 👇



Which Dr William Bay @DrBillyBay sought to challenge in Australia’s Courts


Link 👇


But we also know Australia’s legal system has not been conducive in allowing evidence to be presented over concerns regarding the roll out of the COVID-19 countermeasures, and in particular to children.

Myself and 5 other plaintiffs, apparently did not have enough standing to bring about a challenge to the approval of the countermeasures for children by the TGA including on the advice of ATAGI.


Link 👇


There is now overwhelming evidence that there have been nefarious actions to censor critical information for Australians to make informed decisions about their health, but which also could have saved the lives of many Australians during the last 3 years. My questions around censorship topics focused on:


Link 👇


And what about the role of the NATIONAL COVID CLINICAL EVIDENCE TASKFORCE (NCCET) set up to review the evidence of potential COVId-19 treatments (which by the way were available from the beginning)


Link 👇


No Australian government department has had to face any real scrutiny for their decisions over the past 3 years, either via the courts, over social media due to censorship, or even Australia’s MSM, as it is increasingly becoming evident, they all appear to be a mouthpiece for the State, and as shared by @DumerNatalie, a disrespectful mouthpiece at that.


Link 👇


Australia’s MSM didn’t even run a comprehensive report on an enquiry set up via One Nation Australia and other Senators interviewing expert witnesses regarding Australia’s response to COVID. This alone should prove they are biased and captured.


Link 👇


So, we already know there should be more of a spotlight on our TGA.

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? By: Investigative journalist @MaryanneDemasi


Link 👇


And it’s not through lack of trying to get information out of ATAGI.

Elizabeth Hart @elizmhart, who is an independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, sent this letter to Nigel Crawford, Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI)

Why does ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years?


Link 👇

So, to find out where the head of the snake is, who do Australia’s investigative journalists, researchers, and true representative politicians focus on in this tangled web of Health Bureaucracy overreach and censorship? Is it:


The TGA?








Or is it at a more sinister global level, where organisations like the WHO, the WEF, the UN and individuals such as Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab dictate their censorship terms through people like Australia’s Jane Halton who played an integral part in the EVENT 201 preparedness exercise in October of 2019.


Link 👇


Either way, make no mistake, our government is determined to look at further censorship under the guise of protecting Australians from mis and dis information, just like the Event 201 exercise programmed all stakeholders to work towards.

The question is….Wil you let them?


Link 👇


Mark Neugebauer is a South Australian resident concerned about seen and unseen globalist individuals and organisations who seek to influence all aspects of our lives which could ultimately lead to the degradation of our inalienable human rights.

Mark Neugebauer has not received any direct funding from any individual or organisation mentioned in this article, however this does not prevent those mentioned becoming a supporter of this platform.

Want to reach out or become a contributor? Reach out - [email protected]

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines' are heavily contaminated
Contribution by Julian Gillespie
Serious data has dropped overnight proving the Pfizer and Moderna bivalent 'vaccines' to be heavily contaminated
This note is for particularly informing Australian health practitioners so they may further the discussion, and raise public discussion
.. the implication is the widely administered monovalent 'vaccines' using the same manufacturing processes by each company, are similarly heavily contaminated
the bivalent versions (said to protect against Omicron and Wuhan strains, which they do not do) has already been administered over 50MM times in the US alone
In Australia to 5 February 2023:
For Pfizer, over 44 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 74,500 doses of the bivalent booster (only for adults, presently).
For Moderna, over 5 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 353,000 doses of the bivalent (only for adults, presently.
The contamination has been confirmed by a team led by Kevin McKernan, an indisputable leader in Genomics, part of the Human Genome Project, and pioneer in genomics sequencing .. the guy knows his stuff
Kevin on twitter is : @Kevin_McKernan
.. on substack he publishes as 'Anandamide' the Nepetalactone Newsletter

his latest substack is where all the contamination data and controversy can be read .. the full article Curious Kittens is further below

.. from that long and complex article i have extracted the discussion on the contaminates .. Plasmids (dsDNA) .. it is all about the antibiotic resistant Plasmid which replicate at hyper rates within the large intestine, smashing the gut microbiome, which is needed to keep so many other centres of the body working well, especially brain functioning:
The EMA set limits for dsDNA contamination at less than 330ng/mg RNA. This is roughly 1 part per 3,030 mRNA molecules. It is not clear how they set these standards. For instance, a shot containing 34 trillion mRNAs with a 1 part per 3,000 plasmid contamination rate would equate to over 10 billion dual antibiotic resistant plasmids being transfected per patient. The sequencing evidence we now have on hand confirms that most of this DNA is in-fact the expression plasmid DNA, complete with spike protein, SV40 mammalian expression promoters, dual antibiotic resistance and high copy origins of replication that are compatible with both mammalian and bacterial amplification.
One can make a quick estimate of the relative ratio of the vector to insert nucleic acids by looking at the maximum depth of coverage of the insert versus the vector. Moderna vial 2 has 739X maximum coverage over the vector and 2.2 million X coverage over the insert. This equates to 1 vector for every 3,000 mRNAs.
The Pfizer vials have an order of magnitude higher rates of contamination. This is consistent with the fragment analysis having more off target peaks.
Discussion (in part)
Contamination of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in these vaccines is a significant concern. The EMA specified dsDNA limits in this vaccines below 0.33% (330pg/mg). This is roughly 1 DNA molecule for 3,000 mRNA molecules. While the Moderna vaccines are meeting this specification, the Pfizer vaccines are 10 fold higher in contamination with 1 DNA molecule per 350 mRNAs. This is 1 replication competent plasmid per 350 mRNA molecules and equates to billions of antibiotic resistant plasmids injected per person per shot.

The EMA had good reason to monitor the dsDNA levels in the vaccines. DsDNA injections can induce type I interferon responses via STING in mammals. If these dsDNAs are packaged into LNPs, they can transfect and transform both mammalian and bacterial cells in the patients microbiome. Its not clear how the EMA settled on their acceptable dsDNA contamination and if they had considered contaminating DNA that was capable of amplifying inside the host.

The vectors contain mammalian promoters, bacterial origins of replication in addition to the neomycin and kanamycin resistance genes. Circular plasmids like this are used for stable transfection and continued expression of genes in mammalian cells with the strong SV40 promoter. This could lead to prolonged spike expression in patients injected with these constructs. Bacteria transformed with these plasmids would replicate 50-300 copies of the plasmid per cell. It is not know if the bacteria would also express the spike protein in these plasmids but the presence of T7 promoters in some of the vectors implies this is likely.

Patient use of neomycin or kanamycin after vaccination with these plasmids could enable the the selection of neomycin and kanamycin resistant bacteria in the gut microbiome. It is unclear if the spike protein in these expression vectors is expressed in bacteria. Nevertheless, inoculating billions of people with dual antibiotic resistance, high-copy number plasmids could be a step backwards in our fight against antibiotic resistance. Do these expression vectors transform the gut microbiome? How many copies of the mammalian plasmid expression vectors are replicated post vaccine transfection?

.. at this point let us look at the antibiotics Neomycin and Kanamycin

Neomycin is used to help lessen the symptoms of hepatic coma, a complication of liver disease. In addition, it may be used with another medicine before any surgery affecting the bowels to help prevent infection during surgery.


Kanamycin on the other hand is used to treat serious bacterial infections in many different parts of the body, including:

  • TB involving the lungs
  • active tuberculosis
  • a systemic inflammatory response called sepsis due to an infection with bacteria
  • a bacterial infection
  • an infection of the central nervous system called meningitis
  • pneumonia caused by bacteria
  • infection within the abdomen
  • infection of the biliary tract
  • bacterial urinary tract infection
  • an infection of the skin and the tissue below the skin
  • infection of a joint
  • infection of bone
  • infection of burn wound
.. Kevin McKernan continues:

Arkmedic covers a biodistribution study that demonstrates LNP localization to the large intestine in 48hrs. Even if 1% of the LNPs localize to the intestines, bacteria could amplify these plasmids to far higher levels given the high copy origin of replication in the vectors.

.. Arkmedic reproduced the following biodistribution table which stopped at the 48 hour mark, so the large intestine number of 1.34% would be higher over subsequent days:
.. McKernan concludes (in part):
These are potent contaminants in the vaccines being administered to children. Billions of these contaminants per injection is likely an under estimate of their the entire burden as these plasmids can self replicate in bacterial hosts. Multiple studies have demonstrated prolonged vaccine mRNA clearance. This could be the result of the m1Ψ in the mRNA or the transfection or transformation of DNA based expression vectors. The introduction of billions of antibiotic resistance genes in high copy replication competent plasmids should evoke concerns over accelerating global antibiotic resistance.
Kevin then followed with a tweet storm (click on the image) summarising his extensive paper, which is a great lead-in before launching into read the entire paper:
To assist the lay and expert reader, Dr Jessica Rose also penned a substack overnight directly addressing the Plasmids discovered by Kevin et al .. a really helpful read:
.. Jessica gets straight to the point with:

These expression vectors do not belong in the shots. This is contamination and we do not know if these contaminants are accidental, or if they were put there. I would bet on the former, but either way it doesn’t matter: this is criminally negligent proof of bad manufacturing practices. It’s time to recall these products.

.. please read the entire article so the seriousness of this discovery can be better conveyed
but i can share this .. this data from McKernan was reviewed by a Australian Professor of Medicine last night, and their short note to me in reply was as follows (kept anonymous):
That's bad. Also, whenever a drug is registered it's metabolic byproducts need to be identified and shown to be non-toxic.
Where is the evidence for this with the LNP and mRNA?
And the massive excretion into the environment of this unknown waste.
It's bad enough with metabolites of antibiotics and hormones.
Furthermore, the uniqueness of the above and the metabolites of spike protein and we have the potential for bio-catastrophe.
the title/subject of this note stated these 'vaccines' now pose a risk to the unvaccinated
.. the antibiotic resistance discussed above begins within the human who received the shots (and boosters) .. but that antibiotic resistance can spread throughout communities .. this is what the good Professor of Medicine has alluded to in his note above
only a few nights ago someone i was in discussion with asked me about 'shedding' and these vaccines .. in the context of Spike protein only, i was rather dismissive
.. but i had no idea then about these Plasmids and how easily the resistant bacteria created from them can be transmitted everywhere
upon which topic .. community transmission of these resistant bacteria .. i leave for the experts to better educate us all
please share
Julian Gillespie
LLB, BJuris
Read full Article
post photo preview
Letter to Premier & Deputy Premier Regarding South Australia's Climate Emergency Declaration
Contribution from (Dr) Maureen B. Roberts BSc, BA (Hons), PhD, AMPS Member
This was posted by registered mail on Tuesday 7th February 2023
Peter Malinauskas, MP
GPO Box 2343 Adelaide  SA  5001
Susan Elizabeth Close, MP
GPO Box 11071 Adelaide  SA  5001
7 February 2023
Dear Premier and Deputy Premier 
As one of many citizens concerned about the impact of and rationale for ‘climate crisis’ policies, I am writing to you with a request that you carefully re-evaluate your stance on ‘climate’.
I prefer to believe that you are acting with good intentions and from a sincere belief that we are in a ‘climate emergency’. But science is not based on belief, Peter and Susan; genuine science is grounded in the objective reality of facts that can be proven - and openly debated. Policies justified by a ‘climate emergency’ narrative will severely impact all South Australians in terms of energy availability, reliability and affordability. But there are far more serious ramifications socially, culturally and personally with regard to the basic civil liberties and shared human dignity we have, until recently, enjoyed as free citizens of a democracy. 
Firstly, then, could you please provide the scientific facts upon which you have based your declaration of a ‘climate emergency’, given that there is no scientific consensus on this? In particular, please provide references to any scientific studies which prove (a) the detrimental effect of human activity on climate, and (b) that we have an excess CO2 problem, or that CO2 is in any way harmful.
Why are you (apparently) relying selectively on ‘evidence’ for the existence of a ‘climate emergency’ and ignoring the abundance of equally valid evidence to the contrary? We have been through the same kind of selective bias with the Covid fiasco, i.e. the voices of genuine, concerned experts in the field consistently ignored, vilified, or shouted down in favour of pro-injection ‘safe and effective’ propaganda that was misleadingly put forward as ‘science’. We now know, of course, that these experimental injections are neither safe nor effective. 
For the sake of all South Australians, I therefore request the following:
1) that before pursuing ‘climate emergency’ policies further, you appoint unbiased members of your team to investigate (on your behalf) the wealth of climate science facts and data that can be found on the following websites (as a starting point): [featuring Senator Malcolm Roberts] 
2) that you arrange to confer at length with Senator Alex Antic (and perhaps also Senators Malcolm Roberts and Gerard Rennick via live video) about the likely harmful repercussions of ‘climate emergency’ policies, given that the most serious concerns raised here transcend party politics, relate to our shared human and Australian values, and impact all of us.
3) that you make time to consult the wider public at length and invite their feedback before implementing ‘climate’ policies that will seriously affect most people, especially those already doing it tough, on many levels.
In case you are not already aware of it, there are powerful people who have vested interests in pushing the ‘climate crisis’ narrative, the most influential of them being ‘stakeholder’ capitalist members of the World Economic Forum. Senators Alex Antic, Malcolm Roberts and Gerard Rennick regularly bring up serious concerns about this unelected, anti-democratic, globalist organisation in Federal Parliament hearings, given that there exist numerous WEF members, or affiliates among our politicians. As the WEF have openly boasted, they have infiltrated the cabinets of pretty well every nation. 
On the grounds of an alleged ‘climate crisis’, as you may know, many cities worldwide (including Melbourne) have been mapped out for ‘Smart City’ development. Smart Cities are being aggressively pushed globally by the WEF, who believe they have the right to force all of us to live in a Chinese-style ‘social credit system’, in which our every transaction is monitored through a Digital ID linked to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Our own Federal Government has recently tried to push through legislation banning cash and phasing in Digital IDs, but their moves have (so far) been successfully blocked by morally courageous politicians (Antic, Rennick, Roberts, et al.) who have had the guts and decency to stand up for our democratic freedom. 
The stated goal of these WEF ‘global tyrants' is that by 2030, we will all ‘own nothing’, not our homes, our money, our cars - or our freedom. Smart Cities are a crucial next step toward achieving that goal, this time in the name of an alleged ‘climate crisis’.
Apparently few people, however, wish to live in a 'Smart City’, or ’15 Minute City’ where their every public move is watched through surveillance cameras, they’re forced to keep to their allocated ‘zone' and are allowed to travel only 15 minutes from home. Oxford [UK] Council surveyed its residents and, unsurprisingly, 93% of them said ’No’ to proposed 15 Minute City plans. But in undemocratic fashion, their Council is forging ahead with the plan anyway. Sadly, this is what it is coming to: Councils and Governments no longer representing and serving us, but rather tap-dancing to a globalist agenda. 
Unley has already rolled out Smart City surveillance. Senator Alex Antic discusses worrying aspects of this in his video:
Smart Cities will, of course, be promoted as peaceful, safe, clean utopias where our every need will be met as we ‘save the planet’, but the reality would be a kind of 'open prison’, where movement is restricted and disobedience (e.g. exceeding your travel, or ‘carbon allowance’) is punished. 
Please ask yourself, Peter and Susan: is this the kind of ‘Hunger Games’ scenario you want for your own children? Should you persist in pushing ‘climate crisis’ policies, your children may end up living in a repressive 15 Minute City, in time - if the WEF achieve their ‘Great Reset’ goal - bereft of freedom, possessions, rights, privacy, or human dignity. This is no alarmist scare tactic - it is their publicly stated aim - dressed up, of course, as an altruistic move to ‘save the planet’ (i.e. from us). Disturbingly, they have already drawn up plans for ‘5 Minute Cities.’
If solely for your own children’s sake, then, please do some serious soul-searching - and some equally serious ‘re-search’ on ‘climate’ before pursuing ‘climate emergency’ policies further.
The past few years was (for the WEF) a trial run, when billions worldwide complied with mandates, lockdowns and experimental injections that have since proven to be not only useless for ‘prevention and spread' but also harmful. How harmful? Try asking the families of those killed by these injections, or the 140,000 Australian ‘vaccine injured’ so far reported by GPs to the TGA. Countless lives, relationships, careers and businesses were ruined for the sake of a flu virus that (according to ABS statistics) kills less people than the seasonal flus we’ve lived with for hundreds of years. Now, in place of a ‘health crisis’, the WEF have shifted focus to a ‘climate crisis’ to justify the next round of control and forced compliance.
In the name of all that is humane, wholesome and worth living (and dying) for, my appeal to you is above all else as fellow human beings. Do we want to live in a world where we are treated as (what the WEF regards as) soulless ‘hackable animals’ (their term), deprived of democratic rights, constantly surveilled, and penned into Orwellian Smart Cities on the grounds of an unproven ‘climate crisis’? Or do we want to live as free citizens in a democracy, enjoying all that makes life worthwhile: vibrant community, family values, personal liberty, free speech, human dignity, mutual respect and kindness, access to untouched nature, healthy food and relationships, and the right to celebrate sacred traditions? 
As Elon Musk recently wrote, the 'WEF is increasingly becoming an unelected world government that the people never asked for and don’t want.’ They are perilously close to achieving their objective of total control and it is only ‘we, the people’ who can put the brakes on this juggernaut. But will you, Peter and Susan, choose to be heroes, or moral cowards in this fight?
Time will tell. But I encourage you not to take too long to decide whose side you are on; are you for us, the people, or for the globalist ‘elites’ who have one soulless agenda: unlimited power and wealth?
Good work, by the way, on your recently stated aim of ‘moving closer to eliminating the use of environmentally harmful single-use plastics.’ That’s the kind of ethical and urgently needed action most of us are fully on-board with. It confronts a genuine, growing problem that impacts all life - and doesn’t impinge on our civil liberties. 
Finally, please be advised that this letter will be published online and copies will be sent to numerous Council members and media representatives. I shall also email copies to you both.
Yours sincerely
(Dr) Maureen B. Roberts BSc, BA (Hons), PhD, AMPS Member
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals