Serious data has dropped overnight proving the Pfizer and Moderna bivalent 'vaccines' to be heavily contaminated
This note is for particularly informing Australian health practitioners so they may further the discussion, and raise public discussion
.. the implication is the widely administered monovalent 'vaccines' using the same manufacturing processes by each company, are similarly heavily contaminated
the bivalent versions (said to protect against Omicron and Wuhan strains, which they do not do) has already been administered over 50MM times in the US alone
For Pfizer, over 44 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 74,500 doses of the bivalent booster (only for adults, presently).
For Moderna, over 5 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 353,000 doses of the bivalent (only for adults, presently.
The contamination has been confirmed by a team led by Kevin McKernan, an indisputable leader in Genomics, part of the Human Genome Project, and pioneer in genomics sequencing .. the guy knows his stuff
his latest substack is where all the contamination data and controversy can be read .. the full article Curious Kittens is further below
.. from that long and complex article i have extracted the discussion on the contaminates .. Plasmids (dsDNA) .. it is all about the antibiotic resistant Plasmid which replicate at hyper rates within the large intestine, smashing the gut microbiome, which is needed to keep so many other centres of the body working well, especially brain functioning:
The EMA set limits for dsDNA contamination at less than 330ng/mg RNA. This is roughly 1 part per 3,030 mRNA molecules. It is not clear how they set these standards. For instance, a shot containing 34 trillion mRNAs with a 1 part per 3,000 plasmid contamination rate would equate to over 10 billion dual antibiotic resistant plasmids being transfected per patient. The sequencing evidence we now have on hand confirms that most of this DNA is in-fact the expression plasmid DNA, complete with spike protein, SV40 mammalian expression promoters, dual antibiotic resistance and high copy origins of replication that are compatible with both mammalian and bacterial amplification.
One can make a quick estimate of the relative ratio of the vector to insert nucleic acids by looking at the maximum depth of coverage of the insert versus the vector. Moderna vial 2 has 739X maximum coverage over the vector and 2.2 million X coverage over the insert. This equates to 1 vector for every 3,000 mRNAs.
The Pfizer vials have an order of magnitude higher rates of contamination. This is consistent with the fragment analysis having more off target peaks.
Discussion (in part)
Contamination of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in these vaccines is a significant concern. The EMA specified dsDNA limits in this vaccines below 0.33% (330pg/mg). This is roughly 1 DNA molecule for 3,000 mRNA molecules. While the Moderna vaccines are meeting this specification, the Pfizer vaccines are 10 fold higher in contamination with 1 DNA molecule per 350 mRNAs. This is 1 replication competent plasmid per 350 mRNA molecules and equates to billions of antibiotic resistant plasmids injected per person per shot.
The EMA had good reason to monitor the dsDNA levels in the vaccines. DsDNA injections can induce type I interferon responses via STING in mammals. If these dsDNAs are packaged into LNPs, they can transfect and transform both mammalian and bacterial cells in the patients microbiome. Its not clear how the EMA settled on their acceptable dsDNA contamination and if they had considered contaminating DNA that was capable of amplifying inside the host.
The vectors contain mammalian promoters, bacterial origins of replication in addition to the neomycin and kanamycin resistance genes. Circular plasmids like this are used for stable transfection and continued expression of genes in mammalian cells with the strong SV40 promoter. This could lead to prolonged spike expression in patients injected with these constructs. Bacteria transformed with these plasmids would replicate 50-300 copies of the plasmid per cell. It is not know if the bacteria would also express the spike protein in these plasmids but the presence of T7 promoters in some of the vectors implies this is likely.
Patient use of neomycin or kanamycin after vaccination with these plasmids could enable the the selection of neomycin and kanamycin resistant bacteria in the gut microbiome. It is unclear if the spike protein in these expression vectors is expressed in bacteria. Nevertheless, inoculating billions of people with dual antibiotic resistance, high-copy number plasmids could be a step backwards in our fight against antibiotic resistance. Do these expression vectors transform the gut microbiome? How many copies of the mammalian plasmid expression vectors are replicated post vaccine transfection?
.. at this point let us look at the antibiotics Neomycin and Kanamycin
Neomycin is used to help lessen the symptoms of hepatic coma, a complication of liver disease. In addition, it may be used with another medicine before any surgery affecting the bowels to help prevent infection during surgery.
Kanamycin on the other hand is used to treat serious bacterial infections in many different parts of the body, including:
TB involving the lungs
active tuberculosis
a systemic inflammatory response called sepsis due to an infection with bacteria
a bacterial infection
an infection of the central nervous system called meningitis
pneumonia caused by bacteria
infection within the abdomen
infection of the biliary tract
bacterial urinary tract infection
an infection of the skin and the tissue below the skin
infection of a joint
infection of bone
infection of burn wound
.. Kevin McKernan continues:
Arkmedic covers a biodistribution study that demonstrates LNP localization to the large intestine in 48hrs. Even if 1% of the LNPs localize to the intestines, bacteria could amplify these plasmids to far higher levels given the high copy origin of replication in the vectors.
.. Arkmedic reproduced the following biodistribution table which stopped at the 48 hour mark, so the large intestine number of 1.34% would be higher over subsequent days:
.. McKernan concludes (in part):
These are potent contaminants in the vaccines being administered to children. Billions of these contaminants per injection is likely an under estimate of their the entire burden as these plasmids can self replicate in bacterial hosts. Multiple studies have demonstrated prolonged vaccine mRNA clearance. This could be the result of the m1Ψ in the mRNA or the transfection or transformation of DNA based expression vectors. The introduction of billions of antibiotic resistance genes in high copy replication competent plasmids should evoke concerns over accelerating global antibiotic resistance.
Kevin then followed with a tweet storm (click on the image) summarising his extensive paper, which is a great lead-in before launching into read the entire paper:
To assist the lay and expert reader, Dr Jessica Rose also penned a substack overnight directly addressing the Plasmids discovered by Kevin et al .. a really helpful read:
These expression vectors do not belong in the shots. This is contamination and we do not know if these contaminants are accidental, or if they were put there. I would bet on the former, but either way it doesn’t matter: this is criminally negligent proof of bad manufacturing practices. It’s time to recall these products.
.. please read the entire article so the seriousness of this discovery can be better conveyed
but i can share this .. this data from McKernan was reviewed by a Australian Professor of Medicine last night, and their short note to me in reply was as follows (kept anonymous):
That's bad. Also, whenever a drug is registered it's metabolic byproducts need to be identified and shown to be non-toxic.
Where is the evidence for this with the LNP and mRNA?
Zero.
And the massive excretion into the environment of this unknown waste.
It's bad enough with metabolites of antibiotics and hormones.
Furthermore, the uniqueness of the above and the metabolites of spike protein and we have the potential for bio-catastrophe.
Cheers
XXXXXXXXXXX
the title/subject of this note stated these 'vaccines' now pose a risk to the unvaccinated
.. the antibiotic resistance discussed above begins within the human who received the shots (and boosters) .. but that antibiotic resistance can spread throughout communities .. this is what the good Professor of Medicine has alluded to in his note above
only a few nights ago someone i was in discussion with asked me about 'shedding' and these vaccines .. in the context of Spike protein only, i was rather dismissive
.. but i had no idea then about these Plasmids and how easily the resistant bacteria created from them can be transmitted everywhere
upon which topic .. community transmission of these resistant bacteria .. i leave for the experts to better educate us all
"The purpose of the Live to Love Conference is to assemble and unite believers from various streams and denominations to petition Heaven in worship and prayer for an outpouring of encounters with the love of the Father that will change hearts, lives, families, cities, and nations."
Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
Email sent to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia, and Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Hello again interested readers.
The below email concerning the GMO court case is a follow up to an email (also further down) I sent to South Australia's Premier, Minister for Health and Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer regarding DNA Contamination in the COVID countermeasures.
If you believe my content is of benefit and you would like to support my efforts, you can do so here.
------- Forwarded Message ------- From: Mark Neugebauer Date: On Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 at 3:32 PM Subject: Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected] CC: Many doctors, politicians and media
To:
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
I am following up as I have not heard back from you after my November 8th correspondence below, in which I requested 3 action points concerning findings of DNA contamination in the COVID 19 Countermeasures which you continue to mandate to Health Care Workers in our State.
Peter, Chris, and Nicole, these are truly damning revelations, not just for your ongoing insistence to mandate these countermeasures to South Australian Health Care staff, but the serious implications for yours and the previous Government for coercing and mandating the remainder of the South Australian population to take up the countermeasures. You know I have receipts showing that I have alerted yours and the previous government over the past 18 months to the concerns surrounding the countermeasures on multiple occasions.
To add more weight to these damning revelations, is the book produced by the Australian Medical Professional's Society "Too Many Dead" which I have attached to this email.
The book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. In it, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
What makes your situation worse with more information coming to light as time goes on, is that under the direction of Nicola Spurrier, vulnerable South Australians may have been medically and biologically compromised as a direct result of the strong encouragement, coercion and mandates to take the countermeasures. This is because other government departments and non government service providers put in place policies and mechanisms to inject the elderly in aged care facilities, people living with a disability in disability services, as well as children under the guardianship of the minister as a result of Nicola's directions, and as you know I have raised many concerns to you about these vulnerable cohort.
Clearly there is nothing you can do about all of the South Australians who have taken the countermeasures to date on Nicola's advice, that ship has sailed and only time will tell if there is further legal action to be brought against anyone who coerced or forced a South Australian to take these countermeasures.
However, there is still time for you to act on point 1 of my previous email:
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet https://federation.gov.au/national-cabinet/members, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
Did Australia issue GMP waivers? If so, to whom and for what?
How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
URGENT 🚨 The Court case submission all Australians need to be aware of. 💥
Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister – Update on the Australian GMO case
The below content is a list of 21 cuts from a November 2023 presentation by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister for Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int’l.
The full 2 hour 40 minute version can be found on Charles Kovess’s RUMBLE channel here -
I have left out the first 22 minutes of Julian covering the previous cases.
Julian Gillespie is an experienced barrister, who has conducted some amazing legal work over the past few years, fighting for freedom, human rights, justice and proper application of law. He has fought to protect Australia’s children from being jabbed with the Covid injectables.
Between February and October 2023, Julian’s legal team, with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia, for failing to first obtain GMO licences from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) .. which may or may not have been granted
Julian’s legal team allege the same in the civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing).
Cut 1 – After a review of previous cases, Julian shifts the conversation to the GMO court case and obtaining approval from the donors.
Cut 3 - Overview of expert reports explaining and indicating the countermeasures are GMO’s. Response from Pfizer and Moderna challenging the Australian GMO case submission based on standing. The submission has been heard, awaiting ruling from judge.
Cut 4 – Here Julian introduces Dr Bhula from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator and her significance to the case.
Cut 5 – Julian discusses the lead up to Dr Bhula’s grilling by Gerard Rennick and her critical own goal admission.
mRNA jabs use genetic engineering, yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 -
Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23 -
Cut 6 – Julian outlines what the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admission could mean within a properly functioning legal system, and the catastrophic consequences it would have on the Crown.
Cut 7 – Julian discusses a presentation by Dr Julie Sladden on Spectator TV and the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admissions on the Civil Proceedings.
Cut 8 – Julian provides an overview of the corresponding Criminal Proceedings and that the heat is on the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to act as the ball is fairly in his court.
Cut 9 - Julian believes the Government is in Damage control and political crisis meetings are happening which could be delaying a response from Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.
Cut 10 – Julian provides an overview for the critical evidence of DNA contamination for the Civil case.
Cut 11 – Julian discusses the gaslighting of Australia’s Judiciary by those in power. He provides an overview of the GMO legislation for the UK and EU. He also mentions that he has provided Christine Anderson and Andrew Brigden with a free expert legal brief for them to run with and encourages them to act upon it.
Cut 12 – Julian provides a brief overview of GMO legislation and definitions for Canada, the US and South Africa.
Cut 13 Q & A - Charles Kovess asks, do we have a captured Judiciary?
Cut 14 – Julian indicates that the Judiciary is possibly not captured but merely victims of the information and communication units within government which are linked to the WHO.
Cut 17 Q & A – Anna de Buisseret – the question of blood donations and transfusions affecting blood services and screening out unvaccinated blood. Challenging assertions about safety and the precautionary principle. Attacks via social media, the great work of @Jikkyleaks and calling out bad actors such as the #77Brigade.
Cut 18 Q & A - Gerry Brady – discusses Professor Robert Langer’s 19th January YouTube video making staggering admissions regarding transfection.
The Presentation by Professor Robert Langer 19th January 2023 -- At 40:40, when asked about “Control of the 3D Fold” of the Spike Protein and the risk of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), he admits that (words to the effect) “I wish I knew more about protein folding after you get the vaccine into the cell” (!!)
Julian discusses astounding evidence of scientists as early as March 2020 recommended nasal injected prophylactic. - Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32231345/
Cut 19 Q & A - Mark Steele and Julian discusse sample and testing roadblocks for the Countermeasures which may show evidence of the interconnectedness of biochemicals, nano-particulates, electromagnetic radiation fields, and 5G technology frequencies.
Cut 20 Q & A - Meike Terhorst mentions how GMO issues were flagged in the Netherlands. EU can override local state legislation in and emergency via the EMA, but there is still a requirement to address GMO issues.
Cut 21 - Closing commentary by Stephen Frost and Julian. Was there really a Pandemic?
Thank you for reading.
I will always make my content free to view, and I know a lot of quality content creators are out there and are doing the same, however if you see value in what I am doing and sharing please consider supporting my efforts for $5 month.
I often think, what could I do with an extra 40 hours per week to fight back against tyranny? It would take 1200 people who valued my efforts enough to support me and allow me the opportunity to flick the full-time job which is paying the bills.
Regardless, whatever capacity I have, I will continue to fight on and push back on the people who seek to destroy our freedoms and liberties and rule over us like little gods.
I choose to faithfully follow the one God, and proclaim, “They will be done”.
SA has had 4 decades of bureaucratic capture of Child Protection; and always with an even greater concentration of power into the hands of nameless, faceless, unaccountable elites; save under Dr Leslie Cooper, who advocated for parents (but her recommendations were ignored and overturned some 2 years later in the early 90's); Minister Martin Evans (whose recommendations were overturned just months after the roll out of "Family Preservation Model") and then Minister Stephanie Key (who was promptly removed after she showed a keen interest in holding the bureaucrats accountable. She was the only Minister to actually meet with victims face-to-face!).
Following many correspondences for a mother who had her children removed from her care of literally NOTHING, I can say the current Minister, Katrine Hildyard, is the absolute antithesis of what a responsible and accountable Minister would do in the Child Protection portfolio if "child protection" were really her end objective. IT IS NOT! She is instead covering up lies and absolutely crooked conduct by her staff and she has been caught out on tape & in writing many times now!
If there was a Globalist "Great Reset" in Child Protection, what would it look like?I propose it would look exactly like this...
"Beginning Together: Child Protection and Family Support Symposium."
It proposes a "meeting of the minds" but whose minds exactly? Not yours, or those of ordinary citizens, parents raising kids, grandparents or those caring for loved ones, and certainly not if you have been a victim (like John Ternezis)...
None of these players appear to have any "skin in the game" (e.g. never been falsely accused, lost a child due to lies by Social Workers, advocated for the return of a child to a family, etc...). The Riley Foundation (which is supposed to advocate for families) invariably tells parents "there is nothing you can do, it's all legal, the department can do what it wants" (i.e. stealing kids from families).
But what is this project really? A "top-down" capture of the entire system, to be rendered impenetrable by the ordinary citizen. Run by "experts" for "experts", concentrating power ever more in the hands of a few elites who have never advocated for a mother who has been wrongfully targeted or walked alongside a father falsely accused before having those kids ripped from their care..
QUOTE: "What’s different about this approach is that Minister Hildyard and the Expert Group will be inviting the state to consider how best to redesign the state’s child protection system – starting with a blank page."
How wonderful to know that it is "THE STATE" that is reinventing itself. What could possibly go wrong!? The State is deciding its own structure, powers of authority, mandates, terms of reference and definitions. "Starting with a blank page"? Of course! Why not? Why be constrained by laws, Codes of Ethics & Conduct and conventions of the Public Sector?
It also appears to follow much along the lines of "The Voice"... "Family Matters" are only for the ATSI community, it seems.
Now which are the NGO's that will traffick (um, err, I mean, support) the kids stolen from their families? The usual culprits which will profiteer from the misery generated. Call me cynical but I suspect the same players are already buying into the WEF/UN "Social Impact Bond", so don't be surprised if there isn't a direct link somewhere along the line.
And what do you do to celebrate the capture of more ground to "THE STATE"? You reward yourself by handing out Awards to those who helped you along the journey of course! (Yes, I know, I can't help but be cynical...)
Sign Up for free to see more from this community or subscribe to South Australia In Focus for $5/month to support Mark Neugebauer for more interaction and exclusive content.
