South Australia In Focus
Lifestyle • Politics • Culture
Salisbury City Council (South Australia) Smart Cities
Background and Motion to be presented to Counselors
Guest contributors: MattyIvanovic
post photo preview

BACKGROUND

 

The World Economic Forum and United Nations have joined forces to coercively and tyrannically impose enormously burdensome and draconian restrictions upon the civil liberties, Constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens all over the world.

 

The Local Government Association (LGA) has taken it upon itself to act as a lobby group engaging in highly divisive politics on behalf of WEF/UN, rather than one providing administrative support to Councils and its members.

 

Behind the WEF/UN are the FVEYs (Intelligence agencies from the USA, UK, Australia, Canada & NZ, however it also includes France and Italy, among many others.  In fact, the CIA funded Klaus Schwab’s Harvard Scholarship in 1965!).

 

Pressure is being brought to bear on each and every Councillor towards participating in the Globalist political agenda of Climate Lockdowns, as the LGA is now effectively a lobby organisation, thereby, undermining the “autonomy” of councils (at Part 3(b) of the LGA Act 1999) and the “accountability of councils to the community” (Part 3(d)).

 

COVID lockdowns and restrictions were only the beginning and we are promised by the WEF & UN that we will see far more extreme measures under the guise of Climate Lockdowns which will form the substance of all local Council business across South Australia in short course.  Given the City of Onkaparinga Council’s motion on Climate Change tabled for vote on Tuesday 17th January, 2023, Moved by Cr Marion Themeliotis, it is clear that the LGA will be pushing for all councils to eventually adopt these outrageous and draconian ideologies and all that goes with them, including Net Zero, SMART Cities, Digital ID, Internet of Things (IoT) & Social Credit.

 

I object to being coerced, compelled, cajoled or pressured into how I must vote and what political, religious (or anti-religious) or social causes I must be seen to be supporting.  Do you?  I was not elected by the LGA and I will faithfully, independently, determine what causes and community concerns I will advocate and represent.


Climate Change & SMART Cities are certainly not one of them! 

 

I do, however, have a keen interest in matters of the environment but I believe that the environment cannot be cleaned, maintained or protected by:

·       Feeding Globalist political agendas;

·       Redistributing the wealth of ordinary Australians;

·       Siphoning Australian resources to overseas interests;

·       Depriving developing communities of crucial and life-saving energy resources; or,

·       Taxing the Australian population for outcomes that can neither be measured, achieved or justified.

Rather, I believe that the development and pursuit of local, entrepreneurial endeavours for cleaning the environment are the best, most economic and effective means of ensuring a clean, healthy and sustainable environment whilst overcoming poverty, but in a manner that will meet the needs, and advance the interests, of all Australians, equally, not just the elites who will have no restrictions on their travels or movements.

Each of you as Councillors have the potential for greatness but that doesn't come by following lunatics and psychopaths at the WEF, like Yuval Noah Harari.

 

You cannot embrace the Climate Change ideology and leave behind SMART Cities, 15-minute Cities, Net Zero, Internet of Things (IoT), Blockchain and much more to entrench complete 24/7 surveillance of all people, everywhere, all the time!  These are not mutually exclusive. They work “hand-in-glove”.

 

To date, there has been no proper public consultation on the risks and dangers of the use of SMART technologies and the impact this will have on such things as:

  • The infringement on the Constitutional rights, civil liberties and freedoms of residents
  • The threat to person and property of such surveillance
  • The inevitable likelihood of white-collar crime, graft and corruption among Council staff and Elected Members as the risk of blackmail, extortion and compromise will be unavoidable

We have seen announcements by the state of Victoria of plans to implement 20-minute neighbourhoods and even 15-minute cities in Oxfordshire, New York and Utah, showing this is a global trend being rolled out by stealth by the WEF and United Nations.  This is not a “conspiracy theory”, it is on their own website. 

 

Which councillor or council employee wishes to be required to justify their movements from one end of the council district or beyond, and how much are council staff and elected members willing to pay for such privileges?  Imagine running a business in the City of Salisbury and your competitor has instant access (which they will be able to buy) to all your business data including the names and contacts of your customers/clients, your movements, your business expenditure, data, blueprints, business plans, legal documents, inventory, plant, and all other Commercial In Confidence information.  This is just a TINY example of the dangers of SMART technologies and the IoT, which promises to track and surveil all people everywhere all the time.

 

No government or corporation should have the authority or right to access information contained in mobile phones, but that consent is not being requested by council.  This is immoral and improper, not to mention unconstitutional, yet the IoT promises that our data will be stolen and traded without our knowledge or consent.

 

Imagine one of our Councillors wishes to put a controversial motion before council about a major development and the developer discovers or creates a dirty file on the Councillor or a family member?  We are all exposed to this type of risk for potential blackmail or extortion.  This is also a consideration for businesses and individuals. 

 

Whilst I appreciate that previous Councillors have been lobbied to embrace SMART cities, it is time for Elected Members to hear the very real and genuine concerns of residents.

 

Are you ready to have your every movement tracked, traced, monitored, recorded 24/7 and stored indefinitely and traded by anyone with access to your most private and confidential information? 

 

This is done through the IoT, which includes:

  1. the use of LED lights (with strobe capabilities),
  2. light poles with drone docking stations,
  3. sensors in footpaths, buildings and furniture,
  4. cameras with facial recognition capability (this is not the same technology we have known in the past),
  5. microphones with voice recognition capability,
  6. computers and other devices designed to steal telephone data of every person with a mobile phone, and much, much more.

All of this will be linked to digital ID’s which will form the basis of our new Social Credit Score System.  We, as a Council, are the foot soldiers installing this technology on behalf of powerful Globalist Bankers that have infiltrated all councils for many decades through the LGA and various UN programmes aimed at lobbying Mayors and local government officials.

 

All of this information is easily accessible online.

 

Do you know these SMART technologies are the basis of enabling a Social Credit Score System to be implemented and used for draconian Climate Change Lockdowns, as promised by the WEF/UN?

 

This is un-Australian and has no place in our civilised and democratic society.

 

Up to now, the WEF/UN agenda has been largely hidden from the public’s view and scrutiny, even though WEF and UN proudly boast of their intentions.

 

In the meantime, if you would like to learn a little more about what is in store for your children and grandchildren, there are plenty of resources to direct your own independent research, with checkable sources.

 

DANGERS OF SMART CITIES

 

THE WORLD IS RUN BY CRIMINALS

https://youtube.com/shorts/GyDshu6eF3Q?feature=share

 

“USELESS” HUMANS ARE HACKABLE ANIMALS: SURVEILLANCE UNDER THE SKIN

placeholder

 

PEGASUS SPYWARE COULD END DEMOCRACY

placeholder


BUT THE PEOPLE DIDN'T SEE

placeholder

 

15-MINUTE CITIES

placeholder


THE OLIGARCH PRIME MINISTER

placeholder


FUTURE GLOBAL LOCKDOWN PLANS

placeholder

 

WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT SMART CITIES?

SMART Cities embrace such concepts as: Net Zero, Geofencing, Geoengineering, Climate Lockdowns, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Decarbonisation, Cashless Society, Central Bank Digital Currency, Basic Income, Social Credit Score, Wealth Redistribution/ Restitution, Transhumanism & much, much more.

 

WHERE ARE WE GOING?

SMART Cities is designed to concentrate power over people into the hands of a tiny, influential (usually corrupt) group of powerful elites, in which you & your data are the products & collateral to be traded and exchanged.

 

Initially that will be people such as your local Mayor, a tiny delegation of Councillors & General Managers, property developers, legal firms, medical establishments & the like.  In the longer term these people will become the Kapos (Jewish prison guards) whose role will be to keep you compliant with the most draconian measures the world will ever know, as it moves in “Lockstep” with the directives of multinational corporations, World Bank, World Economic Forum (WEF), World Health Organisation (WHO) & United Nations (UN). 

 

SMART Cities use ”feel good” language & terminologies, pretty colours and diagrams to entice us to embrace the promises of convenience & safety, but in fact it will bring with it the absolute opposite.  Are you willing to have a drone docking station fitted to a light pole at the front of your home so that once a month you can get a hot pizza delivered in 5 mins.  What freedoms are you willing to trade for your convenience?

 

MYTHS AND FACTS OF SMART CITIES

MYTH 1: SMART Cities is a “Conspiracy Theory” [started by Senator Alex Antic].

 

FACT 1: SMART stands for “Self-Monitoring, Analysis & Reporting Technology”. Local Councils, including City of Salisbury, Unley & Adelaide, have provided limited information on plans to roll out SMART City technologies, but sufficient information to demonstrate that Councils are surreptitiously implementing these technologies without informing the public about the risks to their personal safety, privacy & Constitutional rights.  In a video of the SMART City billboard in Unley, Senator Antic factually outlines the technology used in the City of Unley.

 

https://www.facebook.com/SenatorAntic/videos/1041146827286400

 

 MYTH 2: Councils have consulted with local residents about SMART Cities.

 

FACT 2: There is precious little to indicate that anything more than passing references have been made in Council reports, Minutes of Meetings & the odd correspondence to things such as CCTV’s, SMART LED lights & Facial Recognition technologies, but this is not in fact a genuine attempt at community education or consultation.

 

Rather, there are a myriad of things that even General Managers, Mayors & Councillors themselves do not know or understand about SMART City origins & the future consequences for their cities & how these technologies interact with each other.

 

MYTH 3: When you elected your Local Government Councillors you gave them the mandate to ignore your concerns about SMART Cities.

 

FACT 3: Unless your Councillor specifically declared their allegiance to the WEF/UN or a SMART Cities campaign, it is not fair, right or proper for any Councillor to suggest that they have executed their duties of informing their constituents or providing fair opportunity for public debate, with total transparency. 

 

MYTH 4: If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

 

FACT 4: Many Councillors appear disinterested or lazy in protecting their own rights, freedoms & liberties. It is fair to assume, then, that they will have little or no interest or inclination to protect your own. Therefore, it is your job to educate yourself. Verifiable sources of information are easy to access but take time & diligence. You dont know what you dont know. City of Salisbury has indicated through Freedom of Information that there are over 10,000 emails alone pertaining to the roll out of SMART Cities, yet the general public is not privy to vital information such as:

-          Whether & when Councillors have been trained in SMART Cities?

-          How much was spent & how?

-          Who is driving the push for SMART Cities?

-          Who funded & hosted their training/lobbying?

-          How & when were residents “consulted”?

-          Who will own the data collected?

-          Who will own the technologies used to gather data?

-          How will residents know when & how their data is being sold or traded?

-          How do the technologies interact with each other (e.g., how do the street lights interact with a mobile phone?)

-          How can residents opt out & protect their data?

 

To find this information, a simple key word search on Council’s website produces very little & members of the public would have to spend weeks if not months of research & fork out hundreds of dollars on specific FOI applications to glean how extensively Council has engaged in SMART City programs or how far into the future those plans have progressed.

 

MYTH 5: SMART Cities will make our communities & their residents safer.

 

FACT 5: There is no critical or rational basis for this feel-good assertion, especially since there is so much secrecy, ignorance & apathy regarding the origins of SMART City philosophies.  Councillors, agencies, businesses, corporations & governments pushing SMART City technologies & agendas usually have conflicting interests for doing so. This could include financial incentives & kick-backs to the stakeholders which support these objectives. Rewards may include funding for political campaigns, personal protection from liabilities or civil suits, funding & “investment” for various city projects & even dark money to keep opponents silent. The potential for corruption is extremely high, if not inevitable, as 24/7 surveillance exposes every person to the risk of blackmail & extortion. High level technologies in the hands of corrupt authorities will easily be weaponized.

 

 

MYTH 6: “But my Local Government said SMART tech is only used for anonymous data collection, for the benefit of attracting investments & local business & it also doesn't currently use Facial Recognition on the CCTV cameras installed.”

 

FACT 6: Nowadays, all technologies that have cameras, especially CCTV cameras, have the necessary capabilities for Facial Recognition. Would you really put your trust in your Local Governments, multi-national corporations & private businesses never to misuse, share or on-sell your personal information? We already know that even with your mobile phone switched off, it can still gather & record information about you without your knowledge & consent. Yuval Noah Harari said that humans are “hackable animals”.  SMART Cities makes this easy & inevitable, by design!

 

MYTH 7: We have policies to protect residents from breaches of privacy.

 

FACT 7: Breaches of privacy always happen in secrecy.  Thats the whole point!  Local Government policies are a weak protection for residents when personal data is sold, shared or exchanged with multiple parties. Council staff, Mayors & Councillors will come & go.  Councils will almost certainly amalgamate & Councillor numbers will almost certainly be radically reduced (as is happening in Queensland’s City of Kalamunda).  In the shifting sands, holding anyone to account when a breach of privacy occurs will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, as it will take years of litigation & enormous financial resources to seek remedy.  The average person would never likely succeed.  SMART Cities is a Globalist philosophy that considers the common good of residents as superior to the civil rights, liberties & freedoms of individuals.

 

MYTH 8: SMART Cities is a model for a Utopian lifestyle for all residents which promises “livable, productive, sustainable, innovative & affordable” outcomes.  It purports to be about “empowering businesses, governments, & people to make data-driven decisions for increasing prosperity & citizen wellbeing.” (“Switching on Darwin 2020”)

 

FACT 8: SMART Cities is the model of government being deployed for a global power grab by the Oligarchs that run the World Bank, United Nations (UN), World Health Organisation (WHO) & World Economic Forum (WEF) & countless other similar institutions made up of billionaires & trillionaires (e.g., Club of Rome) whose goals are to abolish sovereign governments in favour of a One World Government (or New World Order).  These goals have been clearly stated in documents such as the UN’s Agenda 21/30, The Great Reset, “The First Global Revolution” (by Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider) & many more.

 

MYTH 9: SMART Cities are not about spying on innocent people or about “global enslavement”. Thats ridiculous! It’s about community safety, regulating traffic, saving energy, reducing anti-social behaviours & detecting crimes, whilst delivering luxury & convenience to residents.

 

FACT 9: In a nutshell, SMART Cities are characterised by the full & total adoption of “SMART” technologies for everything in daily community life.  This is known as the Internet of Things (IoT). The promise of IoT is full 24/7 surveillance of everybody, everywhere, all the time.  That data will be shared, sold & traded without your knowledge or consent.  Although many Local Government areas began SMART City projects before 2020, we now see how people’s civil liberties & freedoms have been violated & abused during COVID lockdowns with absolute impunity.  Three years on, many new surveillance technologies have been developed far beyond what Councils would have even thought possible prior to 2020.

 

MYTH 10: Local Government is entitled to collect your data anonymously.

 

FACT 10: Local Government has no legitimate business collecting anyone’s data for reasons other than its normal (LIMITED) course of business.  That does not include how many customers enter its library, the demographics of people walking through its streets & malls, who is using their toilets or other such invasive pursuits by electronic means.  Councils are encroaching on the Constitutional rights of all residents, by stealth, & if residents dont stop this encroachment, it will be too late in future years to come.  When did you consciously or conscientiously give Council your informed consent for its technologies to hack into your phone or other devices & collect your data?

 

MYTH 11: SMART Cities is about improving our lifestyle with conveniences, affordability, reduced consumption & a clean environment.

 

FACT 11: SMART Cities is about total & permanent enslavement & control over each individuals own body & mind.  The WEF has already promised that “You will own nothing & still be happy”.  You will be renting from your unelected, Corporatized Government everything you use (but will never own) including clothing, shoes, kitchen utensils, cars, furniture & your consumption of goods & services will be controlled (e.g., food, paper, gas, electricity, travel, etc…). In the corrupt & corruptible society which SMART Cities will guarantee, & you no longer serve a purpose because you are too old, frail, infirmed, disabled or unemployed, your organs will have greater worth than your body, & there will be no shortage of bounty hunters wanting to cash in on your life as you will be worth more dead than alive (as you become a “Useless Eater” & “Life Unworthy of Life”). 

 

 

MYTH 12: Globalism is not the same as Fascism & Communism. That’s a Right wing, tin foil hat, conspiracy theory.

 

FACT 12: Globalism has been embraced by Left & Right-wing political parties (Labor & Liberal & many others in between) as they have literally been “infiltrated” (to quote Klaus Schwab) by the World Economic Forum (WEF) through dark money flowing into the coffers of political parties & hands of judges, bureaucrats, journalists, universities & Non-Government Organisations (NGO’s) through countless lobby groups & think tanks funded by WEF, WHO, UN & others.  Schwab has a long family history of allegiance to Hitler’s Nazi Germany.  That’s why the Labor & Liberal parties have betrayed the traditional Australian values of freedom, liberty, personal & bodily sovereignty, & Constitutional rights to free speech & rule of law.

 

BACKGROUND:

 

SMART City technologies are designed to utilise the Internet of Things (IoT) to gather, store, exchange, sell or trade personal information and data about private citizens. This data may also be biometric, voice or facial recognition &/or collected from personal mobile phones, computers, watches or other electronic devices.

 

The theft & use of personal information (whether generic & unidentified or not) is not a victimless crime.  It is un-Australian and puts all Australians at risk of harm when this is done without the individuals informed consent.

 

MOTIONS:

 

1.     The City of Salisbury is committed to protecting the Constitutional rights, civil liberties and freedoms of residents as private individuals.

 

2.     The City of Salisbury recognises the right of every private, individual citizen to enjoy their Constitutional rights to personal privacy, civil liberties and freedoms (including freedom of movement, speech & association), free from surveillance, tracking, tracing and/or monitoring by any government &/or corporation and free from the risk of theft, sale and/or trade of their personal information or data.

 

3.     The City of Salisbury will not deploy technologies that will infringe upon the Constitutional rights, civil liberties and freedoms of its residents by stealing their personal data, without the consent of each individual.

 

4.     The City of Salisbury will not deploy technologies that will infringe upon the Constitutional rights, civil liberties and freedoms of its residents by trading or selling the personal data of residents without the consent of each individual.

community logo
Join the South Australia In Focus Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Live to Love Adelaide Conference 2024

Booking - https://www.trybooking.com/events/landing/1098485

Site - https://www.havalah.com.au/

"The purpose of the Live to Love Conference is to assemble and unite believers from various streams and denominations to petition Heaven in worship and prayer for an outpouring of encounters with the love of the Father that will change hearts, lives, families, cities, and nations."

00:00:30
"Very advanced, cool science I would say" - Albert Bourla, CEO Pfizer. "Safe and Effective" The verdict is still out... You decide...
00:09:21
Australia must fight back against Labors Orwellian Mis/Dis information Bill

"To clamp it down (speech) is the most dangerous political step any government could take, and it needs to fail" - Alex Antic

Source @adhtvaus - https://youtu.be/upkYEoypmHA?si=LXVuY3miwTjLPWtf

00:04:14
An evolving list of Mark Neugebauer's Correspondence

Mark Neugebauer is now on SubStack - https://substack.com/@neugie?utm_source=profile-page

1 November 2023 - Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/4898132/australias-gmo-court-case-submission-and-south-australias-ongoing-mandates

19 August 2023 - Response to the Australian Human Rights Commission, claim against employer - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/4454174/response-to-the-australian-human-rights-commission-claim-against-employer

11 August 2023 - Questions arising from information and discussions surrounding the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament (IVtP) - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/4414864/questions-arising-from-information-and-discussions-surrounding-the-proposed-indigenous-voice-to-parl

6 August 2023 - Your encouragement to the constituents of Mawson to vote "Yes" to the Indigenous Voice to Parliament - ...

Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
placeholder
Pfizer whistleblower Melissa McAtee sworn testimony Jan 9, 2024
placeholder
Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
Email sent to the Premier of South Australia, Minister for Health and Wellbeing South Australia, and Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia

Hello again interested readers.

The below email concerning the GMO court case is a follow up to an email (also further down) I sent to South Australia's Premier, Minister for Health and Wellbeing, and Chief Public Health Officer regarding DNA Contamination in the COVID countermeasures.

The original email was inspired by an email thread from Glenn Floyd and Steve Crothers concerning DNA Contamination and WHO powers. The contents of the email thread can be found here - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/4840583/holding-mark-butler-the-australian-minister-for-health-and-aged-care-further-accountable-regarding

If you believe my content is of benefit and you would like to support my efforts, you can do so here.

 

 

------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Tuesday, November 21st, 2023 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Australia's GMO Court Case Submission and South Australia's ongoing mandates
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media

To: 
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
 
 
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
 
I am following up as I have not heard back from you after my November 8th correspondence below, in which I requested 3 action points concerning findings of DNA contamination in the COVID 19 Countermeasures which you continue to mandate to Health Care Workers in our State.
 
I now add for your awareness and for public record information about legal proceedings filled against Pfizer and Moderna which is summarised by the Australian Medical Professional's Society here - https://amps.redunion.com.au/australian-court-covid19-drugs-gmo-pfizer-moderna-law
 
The GMO Case as it's been coined is also thoroughly covered by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister in this presentation to Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int'l, and as you would appreciate due to the serious nature of the situation he doesn't pull any punches. - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/4890031/urgent-the-court-case-submission-all-australians-need-to-be-aware-of
 
Peter, Chris, and Nicole, these are truly damning revelations, not just for your ongoing insistence to mandate these countermeasures to South Australian Health Care staff, but the serious implications for yours and the previous Government for coercing and mandating the remainder of the South Australian population to take up the countermeasures. You know I have receipts showing that I have alerted yours and the previous government over the past 18 months to the concerns surrounding the countermeasures on multiple occasions.
 
To add more weight to these damning revelations, is the book produced by the Australian Medical Professional's Society "Too Many Dead" which I have attached to this email.
The book has been assembled by an aggregation of highly-qualified and experienced doctors and researchers who take their ethics seriously. In it, information has not been withheld, or, worse, blocked.
 
What makes your situation worse with more information coming to light as time goes on, is that under the direction of Nicola Spurrier, vulnerable South Australians may have been medically and biologically compromised  as a direct result of the strong encouragement, coercion and mandates to take the countermeasures. This is because other government departments and non government service providers put in place policies and mechanisms to inject the elderly in aged care facilities, people living with a disability in disability services, as well as children under the guardianship of the minister as a result of Nicola's directions, and as you know I have raised many concerns to you about these vulnerable cohort.
 
Clearly there is nothing you can do about all of the South Australians who have taken the countermeasures to date on Nicola's advice, that ship has sailed and only time will tell if there is further legal action to be brought against anyone who coerced or forced a South Australian to take these countermeasures.
 
However, there is still time for you to act on point 1 of my previous email:
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers - https://twitter.com/Wishuponastar35/status/1718872916895625348
 
Peter, Chris, and Nicola, the ball is in your court, as I have yet again, hereby discharged my civic duty to my fellow Australians.
 
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
 

 
 
------- Forwarded Message -------
From: Mark Neugebauer
Date: On Wednesday, November 8th, 2023 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Fw: WHO pandemic treaty - objections
To: [email protected] , Health:Minister for Health , [email protected] , [email protected]
CC: Many doctors, politicians and media
 
To: 
The Hon Peter Malinauskas MP - Premier of South Australia
Chris Picton MP - Minister for Health and Wellbeing
Prof Nicola Spurrier - Chief Public Health Officer for the State of South Australia
 
Cc: Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care.
 
 
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, as with all my previous correspondence, this one will also be made publicly available.
 
You may recall that I Cc'd you into correspondence to Mr Butler on the 6th April 2023 regarding my ongoing concerns about the COVID 19 Countermeasures and the undeniable evidence that they have caused harm to the global population - The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defense! - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/3804682/re-the-evidence-for-serious-long-term-harm-death-and-lack-efficacy-off-the-covid-19-vaccines-i
 
You may recall I raised concerns about People Living with a Disability whom I cared for prior to being terminated for choosing not to receive the Countermeasure - Annexure 2 – COVID-19 Correspondence regarding the Disability Sector - https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/3216306/annexure-2-covid-19-correspondence-regarding-the-disability-sector
 
As well as my concerns about Children, but in particular Children in Care who were bribed and coerced to take the countermeasures - Annexure 3 – COVID-19 Correspondence Regarding Children https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/3216488/annexure-3-covid-19-correspondence-regarding-children
 
And we have receipts to understand the Virus was never a major risk to children -
placeholder

 
Mr Malinauskas, Mr Picton, Miss Spurrier, I now urge you to read in full the contents of the below correspondence to Mark Butler MP - Minister for Health and Aged Care as it is damning and adds much weight to all the concerns which I have raised to politicians and bureaucrats over the past two years.
 
Miss Spurrier, this will be of great importance to you as you sit on Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC) https://www.health.gov.au/committees-and-groups/australian-health-protection-principal-committee-ahppc#members and the Health Chief Executives Forum (HCEF) - https://www.health.gov.au/committees-and-groups/health-chief-executives-forum-hcef#members which reports back to the Health Ministers’ Meeting (HMM) - https://www.health.gov.au/committees-and-groups/health-ministers-meeting-hmm#members, which Mr Picton, you are part off.
 
 
Extract from Mr Glenn Floyd's correspondence below.
"the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada has just revealed most disturbing life-threatening findings that dangerous levels up to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 products tested."
 
With the evidence now provided to you all in the below email thread, but in particular you Mr Malinauskas as the Premier of South Australia and part of the National Cabinet https://federation.gov.au/national-cabinet/members, I request on behalf of all South Australian's, you:
 
1. Immediately cease all COVID19 Vaccine mandates for South Australian Health Workers - https://twitter.com/Wishuponastar35/status/1718872916895625348
 
2. Request an urgent meeting with Mr Butler to obtain answers to Mr Glenn Floyd's questions and his requests in the below correspondence to Mr Butler. Namely:
  • Instigate an immediate investigation into the frightening Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada findings and issuing an immediate withdrawal of these high-risk toxins if the findings are corroborated by testing of the products in Australia you are coercing.
  • demand and provide from the responsible regulatory bureaucrats,the following specific details: A specific technical/quantitative/numerical Risks Verses Benefits report; and NOT a ‘Qualitative’ report, which does NOT address in any form the absolute weight of technical/quantitative/numerical lethal contaminants evidence revealed in the Open Science Framework Researcher David J Speicher Canada alarmingly high health-risks’ findings.
  • Release all the lot numbers, DNA content and RNA integrity of the vaccines administered in Australia
  • Did Australia issue GMP waivers?  If so, to whom and for what?
  • How many doses per lot were administered in Australia?
  • Did Pfizer disclose the SV40 enhancer-promoter, the SV40 polyA or the HSV-TK polyA signal to the Australian regulatory agencies?
 
3. As per Mr Steve Crothers correspondence below, request of Mr Butler:
  • To table the evidence of Mr Crothers to parliament
  • To Oppose the nefarious WHO treaty
  • To Inform the Australian people of the facts reported to him in Mr Crothers correspondence
 
I encourage you to address this correspondence with urgency, as Mr Floyd points out:
"You are now bound as our Minister, to immediately involve the Australian Federal Police, the Attorneys General and the Directors of Public Prosecutions to immediately investigate Mr. Crothers’ findings that prima facie science evidence potentially represents Criminal Fraud, Criminal Bribery and Criminal Political Corruption"
 
On behalf of all South Australian's I look forward to your response to this serious matter concerning not just South Australians, but ALL Australians.
 
Mark Neugebauer
South Australian concerned about the over reach of Government and unelected Globalists
Read full Article
post photo preview
URGENT 🚨 The Court case submission all Australians need to be aware of. 💥
Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister – Update on the Australian GMO case

 

The below content is a list of 21 cuts from a November 2023 presentation by Julian Gillespie, LL.B., B.Juris, Barrister for Medical Doctors for COVID Ethics Int’l.

The full 2 hour 40 minute version can be found on Charles Kovess’s RUMBLE channel here -

placeholder

I have left out the first 22 minutes of Julian covering the previous cases.

I recommend checking out Charles’s other Rumble content, as well as his TNT Radio Show segments here - https://tntradio.live/presenters/charles-kovess/

 

A quick intro for Julian:

Julian Gillespie is an experienced barrister, who has conducted some amazing legal work over the past few years, fighting for freedom, human rights, justice and proper application of law. He has fought to protect Australia’s children from being jabbed with the Covid injectables.

Between February and October 2023, Julian’s legal team, with the aid of Senator Gerard Rennick presented to the Australian Federal Police (AFP), and the Attorney-General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, a Brief of Information & Evidence to show both Pfizer and Moderna continue to commit serious criminal offenses in Australia, for failing to first obtain GMO licences from the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) .. which may or may not have been granted

Julian’s legal team allege the same in the civil law Federal Court GMO proceedings against Pfizer and Moderna (still ongoing).

 

Cut 1 – After a review of previous cases, Julian shifts the conversation to the GMO court case and obtaining approval from the donors.

placeholder

Australian government, Department of health, Office of Gene Technology Regulator, AstraZeneca Covid 19 vaccine - https://archive.org/details/risk-assessment-and-risk-management-plan-consultation-version-3

Gene Technology Act 2000 - https://www.ogtr.gov.au/about-ogtr/legislative-documents

 


 

Cut 2 -  Julian provided A more detailed overview of the GMO case and who the applicant is

placeholder

Julian Gillespie Substack, Australian criminal brief update - https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/australian-criminal-brief-update

 


 

Cut 3 - Overview of expert reports explaining and indicating the countermeasures are GMO’s.            Response from Pfizer and Moderna challenging the Australian GMO case submission based on standing. The submission has been heard, awaiting ruling from judge.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 4 – Here Julian introduces Dr Bhula from the Office of Gene Technology Regulator and her significance to the case.

placeholder

Link to OGTR site, what we do - https://www.ogtr.gov.au/about-ogtr/what-we-do

 


 

Cut 5 – Julian discusses the lead up to Dr Bhula’s grilling by Gerard Rennick and her critical own goal admission.

placeholder

mRNA jabs use genetic engineering, yet the TGA didn't consult with the Gene Tech Regulator 16.02.23 -

Pfizer confirms gene therapy & the Office of Gene Tech are still in denial - 26.10.23 -

 


 

Cut 6 – Julian outlines what the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admission could mean within a properly functioning legal system, and the catastrophic consequences it would have on the Crown.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 7 – Julian discusses a presentation by Dr Julie Sladden on Spectator TV and the benefits of Dr Bhula’s admissions on the Civil Proceedings.

placeholder

Here is the link to the well edited presentation https://x.com/adhtvaus/status/1724146653664317881?s=20

 


 

Cut 8 – Julian provides an overview of the corresponding Criminal Proceedings and that the heat is on the Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to act as the ball is fairly in his court.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 9 - Julian believes the Government is in Damage control and political crisis meetings are happening which could be delaying a response from Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 10 – Julian provides an overview for the critical evidence of DNA contamination for the Civil case.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 11 – Julian discusses the gaslighting of Australia’s Judiciary by those in power. He provides an overview of the GMO legislation for the UK and EU. He also mentions that he has provided Christine Anderson and Andrew Brigden with a free expert legal brief for them to run with and encourages them to act upon it.

placeholder

The Canaries in the Human DNA Mine - https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/83

 


 

Cut 12 – Julian provides a brief overview of GMO legislation and definitions for Canada, the US and South Africa.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 13 Q & A - Charles Kovess asks, do we have a captured Judiciary?

placeholder

 


 

Cut 14 – Julian indicates that the Judiciary is possibly not captured but merely victims of the information and communication units within government which are linked to the WHO.

placeholder

National Health Emergency Response Arrangements - https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/05/national-health-emergency-response-arrangements.pdf

Emergency Response Plan for Communicable Diseases of National Significance (CD Plan) - https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2022/07/emergency-response-plan-for-communicable-diseases-of-national-significance-cd-plan.pdf

Questions about censorship following "How Twitter rigged the COVID debate" that need to be answered by the Australian Government. (South Australia in Focus)- https://southausinfocus.locals.com/post/3276481/questions-about-censorship-following-how-twitter-rigged-the-covid-debate-that-need-to-be-answered

 


 

Cut 15 Q & A – Stephen Frost and Julian commentary regarding genomic integration and Genetic Disorders.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 16 Q & A - Stephen Frost and Julian, getting the message out via media and social media. What are the known roadblocks?

placeholder

Club Grubbery - https://clubgrubbery.com.au/graham-and-john-discuss-vaccination-genetic-modifications-with-an-expert-panel/

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery - https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/

The Vax-Gene Files: Have the Regulators Approved a Trojan Horse? - https://brownstone.org/articles/the-vax-gene-files-have-the-regulators-approved-a-trojan-horse/

What the shot?! Would Australians have consented if they knew the potential risks? - https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/10/what-the-shot/

Do Covid vaccines meet the definition of gene therapy? Serious questions are being asked of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator - https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/10/do-covid-vaccines-meet-the-definition-of-gene-therapy/

Rowan Dean - https://twitter.com/rowandean

Episode 224 - Part 3 - Covid Refuted You Cannot Be Serious  - https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/episode-224-part-3-covid-refuted/id1474582435?i=1000633295340

 


 

Cut 17 Q & A – Anna de Buisseret – the question of blood donations and transfusions affecting blood services and screening out unvaccinated blood. Challenging assertions about safety and the precautionary principle. Attacks via social media, the great work of @Jikkyleaks and calling out bad actors such as the #77Brigade.

placeholder

Link to Anna de Buisseret’s tweet -  https://twitter.com/AnnadeBuisseret/status/1712009782071058454

 


 

Cut 18 Q & A - Gerry Brady – discusses Professor Robert Langer’s 19th January YouTube video making staggering admissions regarding transfection.

placeholder

The Presentation by Professor Robert Langer 19th January 2023 --  At 40:40, when asked about “Control of the 3D Fold” of the Spike Protein and the risk of ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement), he admits that (words to the effect) “I wish I knew more about protein folding after you get the vaccine into the cell” (!!) 

 

Julian discusses astounding evidence of scientists as early as March 2020 recommended nasal injected prophylactic. - Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32231345/

 


 

Cut 19 Q & A - Mark Steele and Julian discusse sample and testing roadblocks for the Countermeasures which may show evidence of the interconnectedness of biochemicals, nano-particulates, electromagnetic radiation fields, and 5G technology frequencies.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 20 Q & A - Meike Terhorst mentions how GMO issues were flagged in the Netherlands. EU can override local state legislation in and emergency via the EMA, but there is still a requirement to address GMO issues.

placeholder

 


 

Cut 21 - Closing commentary by Stephen Frost and Julian. Was there really a Pandemic?

placeholder

 


Thank you for reading.

I will always make my content free to view, and I know a lot of quality content creators are out there and are doing the same, however if you see value in what I am doing and sharing please consider supporting my efforts for $5 month.

I often think, what could I do with an extra 40 hours per week to fight back against tyranny? It would take 1200 people who valued my efforts enough to support me and allow me the opportunity to flick the full-time job which is paying the bills.

Regardless, whatever capacity I have, I will continue to fight on and push back on the people who seek to destroy our freedoms and liberties and rule over us like little gods.

I choose to faithfully follow the one God, and proclaim, “They will be done”.

 

You can also follow along on:

Twitter https://twitter.com/MarkNeugebaue13

Telegram - https://t.me/SouthAustraliaInFocus

Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/c-1220103

FacistBook – https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100075550210063

Read full Article
post photo preview
HIDE YOUR KIDS: ANOTHER MARXIST "POWER GRAB" BY THE STATE
I am looking into aspects of this latest attempt to allegedly "overhaul" Child Protection in South Australia. BE VERY AFRAID!!!!
SA has had 4 decades of bureaucratic capture of Child Protection; and always with an even greater concentration of power into the hands of nameless, faceless, unaccountable elites; save under Dr Leslie Cooper, who advocated for parents (but her recommendations were ignored and overturned some 2 years later in the early 90's); Minister Martin Evans (whose recommendations were overturned just months after the roll out of "Family Preservation Model") and then Minister Stephanie Key (who was promptly removed after she showed a keen interest in holding the bureaucrats accountable. She was the only Minister to actually meet with victims face-to-face!).
 
Following many correspondences for a mother who had her children removed from her care of literally NOTHING, I can say the current Minister, Katrine Hildyard, is the absolute antithesis of what a responsible and accountable Minister would do in the Child Protection portfolio if "child protection" were really her end objective. IT IS NOT! She is instead covering up lies and absolutely crooked conduct by her staff and she has been caught out on tape & in writing many times now!
 
If there was a Globalist "Great Reset" in Child Protection, what would it look like? I propose it would look exactly like this...
 
"Beginning Together: Child Protection and Family Support Symposium."
https://thesector.com.au/2023/11/13/experts-gather-in-adelaide-to-improve-child-protection-in-south-australia/
 
It proposes a "meeting of the minds" but whose minds exactly? Not yours, or those of ordinary citizens, parents raising kids, grandparents or those caring for loved ones, and certainly not if you have been a victim (like John Ternezis)...
 
None of these players appear to have any "skin in the game" (e.g. never been falsely accused, lost a child due to lies by Social Workers, advocated for the return of a child to a family, etc...). The Riley Foundation (which is supposed to advocate for families) invariably tells parents "there is nothing you can do, it's all legal, the department can do what it wants" (i.e. stealing kids from families).
 
 
But what is this project really? A "top-down" capture of the entire system, to be rendered impenetrable by the ordinary citizen. Run by "experts" for "experts", concentrating power ever more in the hands of a few elites who have never advocated for a mother who has been wrongfully targeted or walked alongside a father falsely accused before having those kids ripped from their care..
 
 
QUOTE: "What’s different about this approach is that Minister Hildyard and the Expert Group will be inviting the state to consider how best to redesign the state’s child protection system – starting with a blank page."
 
How wonderful to know that it is "THE STATE" that is reinventing itself. What could possibly go wrong!? The State is deciding its own structure, powers of authority, mandates, terms of reference and definitions. "Starting with a blank page"? Of course! Why not? Why be constrained by laws, Codes of Ethics & Conduct and conventions of the Public Sector?
 
It also appears to follow much along the lines of "The Voice"... "Family Matters" are only for the ATSI community, it seems.
 
Chair of the South Australian Child Protection Expert Group
 
Now which are the NGO's that will traffick (um, err, I mean, support) the kids stolen from their families? The usual culprits which will profiteer from the misery generated. Call me cynical but I suspect the same players are already buying into the WEF/UN "Social Impact Bond", so don't be surprised if there isn't a direct link somewhere along the line.
 
And what do you do to celebrate the capture of more ground to "THE STATE"? You reward yourself by handing out Awards to those who helped you along the journey of course! (Yes, I know, I can't help but be cynical...)
https://www.childprotection.sa.gov.au/child-protection-initiatives/sa-child-protection-awards
 
Please start doing your own research... This is only what I can glean in a few short hours but I am pressed for time....
 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals