South Australia In Focus
Lifestyle • Politics • Culture
South Australia’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency. (DCE)
post photo preview

South Australia’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency. (DCE)

From: erich.neug <[email protected]>

To: [email protected], [email protected]

CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Simon Rothwell<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Roberts, Malcolm (Senator)<[email protected]>, Rennick, Gerard (Senator)<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]


Date: Saturday, January 21st, 2023 at 14:15Saturday, January 21st, 2023 at 14:15


South Australia’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency. (DCE)

To: Peter Malinauskas, acting as Premier of South Australia - [email protected]

       Susan Elizabeth Close, acting as Minister for Climate – [email protected]

Dear Peter and Susan,

I am writing to you today to pose some questions in relation to the South Australian Labor Government’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency (DCE) in June of 2022, Tweeted here.

As with all my correspondence, this one is also publicly available.

Before I pose my questions, I have to say, enduring the last 3 years of the emergency declared because of the virus known as COVID-19, I find it extremely worrying when Australian Governments declare emergencies, regardless which political party is enacting said emergency, and you should know, I’ve written about it extensively to you and many others here.

The other concern of mine and many other South Australian’s whom I am in contact with, is that you and your cohort believe the science is settled regarding the climate change debate, when in fact it is far from it. You, your cohort, and advisors continue to push your position of a catastrophic climate emergency, and sell it as a forgone conclusion, when in fact many are challenging this position.

As of the date of this letter, there are currently 1410 signatories to a World Climate declaration – There is no Climate Emergency by Climate Intelligence (CLINTEL). There is also a lot of demonising of CO2, and I draw your attention to a Quiz by the CO2 Coalition which might surprise you. Another very strong voice is Tony Heller at Real Climate Science, as well as Australia’s Ian Plimer, to name just a few.

I suspect that the majority of South Australian’s have not been made aware of alternative voices, and that is likely due to the coordinated censoring and suppression of these dissenting voices, much like what has happened during COVID-19, which I wrote about and copied you in on as well.

I myself became more acutely aware of the high level push towards renewables and a declaration of a climate emergency by globalist entities who are pursuing centralised control and governance over the worlds population while I was researching for a recent article about proposed windfarms of the coast of Kingston South Australia.  

Many people are now also aware that these same globalist entities who have organised COP27 and DAVOS (Although with some hypocrisy and here) are behind the push for the WHO Pandemic Treaty, as well as adopting Smart Cities Technologies, which South Australia is also embracing, all of which is concerning many South Australians whom I am in contact with.

As you would know, and I note in the above article, there are 16 councils already singing in harmony with the state to declare a climate emergency and embrace a Climate Change Response and Adaptation plan such as in my own council area. This push appears to be part of the UN’s Sustainability Goals, embraced by the now familiar WEF, ECLEI, our own State, and  SA LGA.

It is mentioned in the media release that “Minister Close last year tabled a petition with more than 10,000 signatures from South Australians demanding immediate action on climate change.”

That’s only 0.59% of the 1.7 million South Australian population who thought that Climate Change was a serious enough issue to warrant signing a petition to declare a climate emergency.


A similar result became evident when the City of Onkaparinga sought feedback in surveys for proposed goals and for council-led action on renewables among other things, and had 1,700 responses out of a population of 177,000 (0.96%). One would think that if South Australian’s believed there was an actual Climate Emergency, the results of surveys and polls would be substantially higher than those percentages.


So, now I pose these very important questions to you both for myself and on behalf of many others concerned about the overreach implications resulting from the DCE:

1.      Was the push to declare a climate emergency a result of a substantial number of South Australian’s urging action on climate change or was it driven primarily by Global stakeholders mentioned above as well as with those already captured by climate change action groups?

2.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory “15 minute cities” which have been adopted and planned in Oxfordshire/Paris/Madrid/Milan/Ottawa/Seattle, and Melbourne, all under the guise of a Climate Change Emergency?

3.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory Smart Electricity Meters which have many concerned about more and more control from energy regulators.

4.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory Smart Water Meters which also has potential for more control over consumer usage?

5.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory driving limits for non-electric vehicles, thus restricting regional residents (Who are not part of 15-minute cities) from visiting friends and relatives in other townships?

6.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government to put machinations in place to force “climigration” and coax people out of small communities into bigger towns and cities by claiming small communities are in danger or no longer viable under a Climate Emergency?

7.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory conversion of current older vehicles or replacing older manufactured vehicles to full electric vehicle?

8.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for mandatory installations of solar panels and battery storage units when many families are unable to afford this?

9.      Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government to mandate citizens to track their individual Carbon footprint which has the potential to lead to a social credit system, seeing the technology is in the process of being made available to Australians?

10.  Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government to restrict individual consumption and travel if someone has exceeded a predetermined carbon allowance as suggested by some?

11.  Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government to enforce dietary regulations on the South Australian community under the guise of the Climate Emergency?

12.  Will the DCE lead the South Australian Government, the LGA and councils to push for a ban on Natural Gas as in some jurisdictions? Will this see an end to the Aussie BBQ?

You see Peter and Susan, the more sinister aspect of what we’ve experienced over the past 3 years under the guise of a health emergency, is, that it is not too far fetched for concerned South Australians to imagine that under the declaration of a climate emergency an authoritarian South Australian Government could turn on and off the tap to many of the things we freely have access to now, such as:

·         Access to our own money via a CBDC, SMART Cities Technology and for exceeding Carbon allowances

·         Access to our utilities with SMART Meter technologies

·         Access to Natural gas for our stoves, heating, and BBQ’s

·         Access to own vehicle long distance travel via checkpoints, SMART Cities technologies, lockout systems to the electronics in our vehicles.

·         Access to the communities we choose to live in.

·         Access to meat and dairy products, etc.

You, your government, its bureaucrats, the captured mainstream and social media, and other captured or hoodwinked commentators may well continue the rhetoric of labelling all those who are concerned about and pushing back on local, state, federal government and regulatory overreach as tin foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists, nut jobs, cookers, and spreaders of misinformation.

BUT the tide is turning, and many South Australians have awakened and are collaborating to hold local, state, federal government and regulatory agencies to account for public policy over reach, and as long as Elon Musk works to continue to make Twitter an open and transparent free speech platform, and publications like the Epoch Times and the Spectator grow in reach, this will continue.

However I’m sure the cohort behind the Climate Emergency push will work very hard to get this under control with legislative powers, and help from global partners who own the science, it’s not as if they haven’t had time to plan for

in detail.

I guess in closing, I should ask one final question to add to the ones above:

13.  Are any individuals in the South Australian local, state, and federal government, LGA and other regulatory bodies captured by

in pushing the Climate Emergency narrative?

Not just me, but many South Australian’s look forward to answers to those questions.

Mark Neugebauer

South Australian concerned about public policy overreach.

21st January 2023

Mark Neugebauer is a South Australian resident concerned about seen and unseen globalist individuals and organisations who seek to influence all aspects of our lives which could ultimately lead to the degradation of our inalienable human rights.

Mark Neugebauer has not received any direct funding from any individual or organisation mentioned in this article, however this does not prevent those mentioned becoming a supporter of this platform.

Want to reach out or become a contributor? Reach out - [email protected]

community logo
Join the South Australia In Focus Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
What else you may like…
“Crossroads” The WHOs promotion of CSE

Time to #ExitTheWho #ExitTheUN #ExitTheWEF
Comprehensive Sexuality Education
Put together by a friend, who is an extremely concerned father and grandfather.

Shocked mother warns the world - The indoctrination of our children continues. -

🚨 Forest of the Fallen South Australia 🚨 🚨 Including CHILDREN 🚨

How many more children will be added to displays like this around the country 🇦🇺 before more people stand up and our politicians and bureaucrats are held to account?

Website to The Forest of the Fallen -

Kate Mason's first attempt at raising concerns at Central Coast Council - many more to come.

We all must do more to push back on centralisation and globalisation of our councils.

Thank you Kate Mason ( for your bravery and giving a voice to the constituents in your council electorate.

An evolving list of Mark Neugebauer's Correspondence

6 April 2023 - Re: – The evidence for serious long-term harm, death and lack efficacy off the COVID-19 Vaccines is now overwhelming, and ignorance may no longer be a defence! -

22 February 2023 - Ongoing emerging information and data regarding COVID-19 Vaccine harm in children. -

21 January 2023 - South Australia’s Declaration of a Climate Emergency. (DCE). -

29 December 2022 - Questions about censorship following "How Twitter rigged the COVID
debate" that need to be answered by the Australian Government. - ...

"FOREST OF THE FALLEN" visual display.

HELPERS WANTED : late notice (I know, right. I was waiting to see the weather forecast 😊💜).

"FOREST OF THE FALLEN" visual display.

Saturday 3rd June
9am-3pm (approx)
Wanting confirmed helpers (minimum 3 people always).

NOTE : this is a SILENT & PEACEFUL DISPLAY, sharing testimonies of the Jab Injured, & deceased. We are aiming to encourage curiosity, rather than attempting confrontation.

exact location TBA

Help is for setting up display at 9am, perhaps staying for a bit, or even all day if you can. Weather is going to be about 19°.

These displays are

Many hands make light work.

Contact Loraine
[email protected]

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery

Contribution from Julian Gillespie

Some many of you may have come across the below recently .. many will have not

The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery -

"If McKernan’s findings are verified, the implications are serious. Widespread DNA contamination
would bring into question the quality of the entire #mRNA injection manufacturing process,
safety systems, and regulatory oversight."

.. over the past several days the article has generated over 800K views with shares and reposts on twitter .. twitter folk are not happy -

and not a single regulator or mainstream news outlet wishes to comment or pick up this frightening data .. but heck, only the human genome, right

many comments across social media question the extent of contamination across the many batches released by Pfizer and Moderna globally

Kevin McKernan appears to have received his bivalent samples, and later monovalent sample, ...

post photo preview
The Australian Twitter Files
Australia's very own health censorship apparatus in full swing


With the 🇦🇺 #AusTwitterFiles on censorship gaining traction with Senator Alex Antic's revelation from a recent freedom of information request, I encourage all who have an investigative mind to dig further into any conflicts of interest and links to global corporatist entities by the ATAGI and the TGA. 



I recently wrote to Brendan Murphy and Mark Butler with my ongoing concerns about COVID19 Countermeasures and Children (especially those in care)


Link 👇


In the response received by Dr Grant Pegg, Principal Medical Advisor, Pharmacovigilance Branch, Health Products Regulation Group, he passed the buck (they do this a lot) to ATAGI and TGA


Link 👇

So, with @mtaibbi and @NAffects confirming the relationship between Twitter 1.0 and the Department of Home Affairs.


Link 👇


Link 👇

In @SenatorAntic recent cross examination of the Dept. of Home Affairs, they confirmed that they are not responsible for determining the reason they should request the removal of content from social media platforms but are acting on the “expert advice from the Department of Health”.


Link 👇


I had already writen a letter requesting if Australia’s government had been involved in censorship as exposed by the original #TwitterFiles 


Link 👇


In their reply, they fobbed me off, and as we have now come to understand, knowing full well they were giving "expert advice” to the Department of Home Affairs to censor Australian social media accounts.


Link 👇


So, now that we know the Department of Health is directing the Department of Home affairs to censor Australians on COVID related conversations, but the Department of Health is receiving their expert advice from ATAGI and the TGA.

Who is the main driver behind censoring critical information and debate?

We now know that the AHPRA censored Australian doctors for recommending early treatment protocols and against any concerns they might have had regarding the COVID-19 countermeasures, so as not to “undermine” the roll out.


Link 👇


And as we’ve found out from a letter sent to suspended Dr William Bay, “AHPRA acts independently to the Australian Government. 👇



Which Dr William Bay @DrBillyBay sought to challenge in Australia’s Courts


Link 👇


But we also know Australia’s legal system has not been conducive in allowing evidence to be presented over concerns regarding the roll out of the COVID-19 countermeasures, and in particular to children.

Myself and 5 other plaintiffs, apparently did not have enough standing to bring about a challenge to the approval of the countermeasures for children by the TGA including on the advice of ATAGI.


Link 👇


There is now overwhelming evidence that there have been nefarious actions to censor critical information for Australians to make informed decisions about their health, but which also could have saved the lives of many Australians during the last 3 years. My questions around censorship topics focused on:


Link 👇


And what about the role of the NATIONAL COVID CLINICAL EVIDENCE TASKFORCE (NCCET) set up to review the evidence of potential COVId-19 treatments (which by the way were available from the beginning)


Link 👇


No Australian government department has had to face any real scrutiny for their decisions over the past 3 years, either via the courts, over social media due to censorship, or even Australia’s MSM, as it is increasingly becoming evident, they all appear to be a mouthpiece for the State, and as shared by @DumerNatalie, a disrespectful mouthpiece at that.


Link 👇


Australia’s MSM didn’t even run a comprehensive report on an enquiry set up via One Nation Australia and other Senators interviewing expert witnesses regarding Australia’s response to COVID. This alone should prove they are biased and captured.


Link 👇


So, we already know there should be more of a spotlight on our TGA.

From FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire? By: Investigative journalist @MaryanneDemasi


Link 👇


And it’s not through lack of trying to get information out of ATAGI.

Elizabeth Hart @elizmhart, who is an independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, sent this letter to Nigel Crawford, Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI)

Why does ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years?


Link 👇

So, to find out where the head of the snake is, who do Australia’s investigative journalists, researchers, and true representative politicians focus on in this tangled web of Health Bureaucracy overreach and censorship? Is it:


The TGA?








Or is it at a more sinister global level, where organisations like the WHO, the WEF, the UN and individuals such as Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab dictate their censorship terms through people like Australia’s Jane Halton who played an integral part in the EVENT 201 preparedness exercise in October of 2019.


Link 👇


Either way, make no mistake, our government is determined to look at further censorship under the guise of protecting Australians from mis and dis information, just like the Event 201 exercise programmed all stakeholders to work towards.

The question is….Wil you let them?


Link 👇


Mark Neugebauer is a South Australian resident concerned about seen and unseen globalist individuals and organisations who seek to influence all aspects of our lives which could ultimately lead to the degradation of our inalienable human rights.

Mark Neugebauer has not received any direct funding from any individual or organisation mentioned in this article, however this does not prevent those mentioned becoming a supporter of this platform.

Want to reach out or become a contributor? Reach out - [email protected]

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Pfizer and Moderna 'vaccines' are heavily contaminated
Contribution by Julian Gillespie
Serious data has dropped overnight proving the Pfizer and Moderna bivalent 'vaccines' to be heavily contaminated
This note is for particularly informing Australian health practitioners so they may further the discussion, and raise public discussion
.. the implication is the widely administered monovalent 'vaccines' using the same manufacturing processes by each company, are similarly heavily contaminated
the bivalent versions (said to protect against Omicron and Wuhan strains, which they do not do) has already been administered over 50MM times in the US alone
In Australia to 5 February 2023:
For Pfizer, over 44 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 74,500 doses of the bivalent booster (only for adults, presently).
For Moderna, over 5 million monovalent doses have been administered, and approximately 353,000 doses of the bivalent (only for adults, presently.
The contamination has been confirmed by a team led by Kevin McKernan, an indisputable leader in Genomics, part of the Human Genome Project, and pioneer in genomics sequencing .. the guy knows his stuff
Kevin on twitter is : @Kevin_McKernan
.. on substack he publishes as 'Anandamide' the Nepetalactone Newsletter

his latest substack is where all the contamination data and controversy can be read .. the full article Curious Kittens is further below

.. from that long and complex article i have extracted the discussion on the contaminates .. Plasmids (dsDNA) .. it is all about the antibiotic resistant Plasmid which replicate at hyper rates within the large intestine, smashing the gut microbiome, which is needed to keep so many other centres of the body working well, especially brain functioning:
The EMA set limits for dsDNA contamination at less than 330ng/mg RNA. This is roughly 1 part per 3,030 mRNA molecules. It is not clear how they set these standards. For instance, a shot containing 34 trillion mRNAs with a 1 part per 3,000 plasmid contamination rate would equate to over 10 billion dual antibiotic resistant plasmids being transfected per patient. The sequencing evidence we now have on hand confirms that most of this DNA is in-fact the expression plasmid DNA, complete with spike protein, SV40 mammalian expression promoters, dual antibiotic resistance and high copy origins of replication that are compatible with both mammalian and bacterial amplification.
One can make a quick estimate of the relative ratio of the vector to insert nucleic acids by looking at the maximum depth of coverage of the insert versus the vector. Moderna vial 2 has 739X maximum coverage over the vector and 2.2 million X coverage over the insert. This equates to 1 vector for every 3,000 mRNAs.
The Pfizer vials have an order of magnitude higher rates of contamination. This is consistent with the fragment analysis having more off target peaks.
Discussion (in part)
Contamination of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) in these vaccines is a significant concern. The EMA specified dsDNA limits in this vaccines below 0.33% (330pg/mg). This is roughly 1 DNA molecule for 3,000 mRNA molecules. While the Moderna vaccines are meeting this specification, the Pfizer vaccines are 10 fold higher in contamination with 1 DNA molecule per 350 mRNAs. This is 1 replication competent plasmid per 350 mRNA molecules and equates to billions of antibiotic resistant plasmids injected per person per shot.

The EMA had good reason to monitor the dsDNA levels in the vaccines. DsDNA injections can induce type I interferon responses via STING in mammals. If these dsDNAs are packaged into LNPs, they can transfect and transform both mammalian and bacterial cells in the patients microbiome. Its not clear how the EMA settled on their acceptable dsDNA contamination and if they had considered contaminating DNA that was capable of amplifying inside the host.

The vectors contain mammalian promoters, bacterial origins of replication in addition to the neomycin and kanamycin resistance genes. Circular plasmids like this are used for stable transfection and continued expression of genes in mammalian cells with the strong SV40 promoter. This could lead to prolonged spike expression in patients injected with these constructs. Bacteria transformed with these plasmids would replicate 50-300 copies of the plasmid per cell. It is not know if the bacteria would also express the spike protein in these plasmids but the presence of T7 promoters in some of the vectors implies this is likely.

Patient use of neomycin or kanamycin after vaccination with these plasmids could enable the the selection of neomycin and kanamycin resistant bacteria in the gut microbiome. It is unclear if the spike protein in these expression vectors is expressed in bacteria. Nevertheless, inoculating billions of people with dual antibiotic resistance, high-copy number plasmids could be a step backwards in our fight against antibiotic resistance. Do these expression vectors transform the gut microbiome? How many copies of the mammalian plasmid expression vectors are replicated post vaccine transfection?

.. at this point let us look at the antibiotics Neomycin and Kanamycin

Neomycin is used to help lessen the symptoms of hepatic coma, a complication of liver disease. In addition, it may be used with another medicine before any surgery affecting the bowels to help prevent infection during surgery.


Kanamycin on the other hand is used to treat serious bacterial infections in many different parts of the body, including:

  • TB involving the lungs
  • active tuberculosis
  • a systemic inflammatory response called sepsis due to an infection with bacteria
  • a bacterial infection
  • an infection of the central nervous system called meningitis
  • pneumonia caused by bacteria
  • infection within the abdomen
  • infection of the biliary tract
  • bacterial urinary tract infection
  • an infection of the skin and the tissue below the skin
  • infection of a joint
  • infection of bone
  • infection of burn wound
.. Kevin McKernan continues:

Arkmedic covers a biodistribution study that demonstrates LNP localization to the large intestine in 48hrs. Even if 1% of the LNPs localize to the intestines, bacteria could amplify these plasmids to far higher levels given the high copy origin of replication in the vectors.

.. Arkmedic reproduced the following biodistribution table which stopped at the 48 hour mark, so the large intestine number of 1.34% would be higher over subsequent days:
.. McKernan concludes (in part):
These are potent contaminants in the vaccines being administered to children. Billions of these contaminants per injection is likely an under estimate of their the entire burden as these plasmids can self replicate in bacterial hosts. Multiple studies have demonstrated prolonged vaccine mRNA clearance. This could be the result of the m1Ψ in the mRNA or the transfection or transformation of DNA based expression vectors. The introduction of billions of antibiotic resistance genes in high copy replication competent plasmids should evoke concerns over accelerating global antibiotic resistance.
Kevin then followed with a tweet storm (click on the image) summarising his extensive paper, which is a great lead-in before launching into read the entire paper:
To assist the lay and expert reader, Dr Jessica Rose also penned a substack overnight directly addressing the Plasmids discovered by Kevin et al .. a really helpful read:
.. Jessica gets straight to the point with:

These expression vectors do not belong in the shots. This is contamination and we do not know if these contaminants are accidental, or if they were put there. I would bet on the former, but either way it doesn’t matter: this is criminally negligent proof of bad manufacturing practices. It’s time to recall these products.

.. please read the entire article so the seriousness of this discovery can be better conveyed
but i can share this .. this data from McKernan was reviewed by a Australian Professor of Medicine last night, and their short note to me in reply was as follows (kept anonymous):
That's bad. Also, whenever a drug is registered it's metabolic byproducts need to be identified and shown to be non-toxic.
Where is the evidence for this with the LNP and mRNA?
And the massive excretion into the environment of this unknown waste.
It's bad enough with metabolites of antibiotics and hormones.
Furthermore, the uniqueness of the above and the metabolites of spike protein and we have the potential for bio-catastrophe.
the title/subject of this note stated these 'vaccines' now pose a risk to the unvaccinated
.. the antibiotic resistance discussed above begins within the human who received the shots (and boosters) .. but that antibiotic resistance can spread throughout communities .. this is what the good Professor of Medicine has alluded to in his note above
only a few nights ago someone i was in discussion with asked me about 'shedding' and these vaccines .. in the context of Spike protein only, i was rather dismissive
.. but i had no idea then about these Plasmids and how easily the resistant bacteria created from them can be transmitted everywhere
upon which topic .. community transmission of these resistant bacteria .. i leave for the experts to better educate us all
please share
Julian Gillespie
LLB, BJuris
Read full Article
post photo preview
Letter to Premier & Deputy Premier Regarding South Australia's Climate Emergency Declaration
Contribution from (Dr) Maureen B. Roberts BSc, BA (Hons), PhD, AMPS Member
This was posted by registered mail on Tuesday 7th February 2023
Peter Malinauskas, MP
GPO Box 2343 Adelaide  SA  5001
Susan Elizabeth Close, MP
GPO Box 11071 Adelaide  SA  5001
7 February 2023
Dear Premier and Deputy Premier 
As one of many citizens concerned about the impact of and rationale for ‘climate crisis’ policies, I am writing to you with a request that you carefully re-evaluate your stance on ‘climate’.
I prefer to believe that you are acting with good intentions and from a sincere belief that we are in a ‘climate emergency’. But science is not based on belief, Peter and Susan; genuine science is grounded in the objective reality of facts that can be proven - and openly debated. Policies justified by a ‘climate emergency’ narrative will severely impact all South Australians in terms of energy availability, reliability and affordability. But there are far more serious ramifications socially, culturally and personally with regard to the basic civil liberties and shared human dignity we have, until recently, enjoyed as free citizens of a democracy. 
Firstly, then, could you please provide the scientific facts upon which you have based your declaration of a ‘climate emergency’, given that there is no scientific consensus on this? In particular, please provide references to any scientific studies which prove (a) the detrimental effect of human activity on climate, and (b) that we have an excess CO2 problem, or that CO2 is in any way harmful.
Why are you (apparently) relying selectively on ‘evidence’ for the existence of a ‘climate emergency’ and ignoring the abundance of equally valid evidence to the contrary? We have been through the same kind of selective bias with the Covid fiasco, i.e. the voices of genuine, concerned experts in the field consistently ignored, vilified, or shouted down in favour of pro-injection ‘safe and effective’ propaganda that was misleadingly put forward as ‘science’. We now know, of course, that these experimental injections are neither safe nor effective. 
For the sake of all South Australians, I therefore request the following:
1) that before pursuing ‘climate emergency’ policies further, you appoint unbiased members of your team to investigate (on your behalf) the wealth of climate science facts and data that can be found on the following websites (as a starting point): [featuring Senator Malcolm Roberts] 
2) that you arrange to confer at length with Senator Alex Antic (and perhaps also Senators Malcolm Roberts and Gerard Rennick via live video) about the likely harmful repercussions of ‘climate emergency’ policies, given that the most serious concerns raised here transcend party politics, relate to our shared human and Australian values, and impact all of us.
3) that you make time to consult the wider public at length and invite their feedback before implementing ‘climate’ policies that will seriously affect most people, especially those already doing it tough, on many levels.
In case you are not already aware of it, there are powerful people who have vested interests in pushing the ‘climate crisis’ narrative, the most influential of them being ‘stakeholder’ capitalist members of the World Economic Forum. Senators Alex Antic, Malcolm Roberts and Gerard Rennick regularly bring up serious concerns about this unelected, anti-democratic, globalist organisation in Federal Parliament hearings, given that there exist numerous WEF members, or affiliates among our politicians. As the WEF have openly boasted, they have infiltrated the cabinets of pretty well every nation. 
On the grounds of an alleged ‘climate crisis’, as you may know, many cities worldwide (including Melbourne) have been mapped out for ‘Smart City’ development. Smart Cities are being aggressively pushed globally by the WEF, who believe they have the right to force all of us to live in a Chinese-style ‘social credit system’, in which our every transaction is monitored through a Digital ID linked to a Central Bank Digital Currency. Our own Federal Government has recently tried to push through legislation banning cash and phasing in Digital IDs, but their moves have (so far) been successfully blocked by morally courageous politicians (Antic, Rennick, Roberts, et al.) who have had the guts and decency to stand up for our democratic freedom. 
The stated goal of these WEF ‘global tyrants' is that by 2030, we will all ‘own nothing’, not our homes, our money, our cars - or our freedom. Smart Cities are a crucial next step toward achieving that goal, this time in the name of an alleged ‘climate crisis’.
Apparently few people, however, wish to live in a 'Smart City’, or ’15 Minute City’ where their every public move is watched through surveillance cameras, they’re forced to keep to their allocated ‘zone' and are allowed to travel only 15 minutes from home. Oxford [UK] Council surveyed its residents and, unsurprisingly, 93% of them said ’No’ to proposed 15 Minute City plans. But in undemocratic fashion, their Council is forging ahead with the plan anyway. Sadly, this is what it is coming to: Councils and Governments no longer representing and serving us, but rather tap-dancing to a globalist agenda. 
Unley has already rolled out Smart City surveillance. Senator Alex Antic discusses worrying aspects of this in his video:
Smart Cities will, of course, be promoted as peaceful, safe, clean utopias where our every need will be met as we ‘save the planet’, but the reality would be a kind of 'open prison’, where movement is restricted and disobedience (e.g. exceeding your travel, or ‘carbon allowance’) is punished. 
Please ask yourself, Peter and Susan: is this the kind of ‘Hunger Games’ scenario you want for your own children? Should you persist in pushing ‘climate crisis’ policies, your children may end up living in a repressive 15 Minute City, in time - if the WEF achieve their ‘Great Reset’ goal - bereft of freedom, possessions, rights, privacy, or human dignity. This is no alarmist scare tactic - it is their publicly stated aim - dressed up, of course, as an altruistic move to ‘save the planet’ (i.e. from us). Disturbingly, they have already drawn up plans for ‘5 Minute Cities.’
If solely for your own children’s sake, then, please do some serious soul-searching - and some equally serious ‘re-search’ on ‘climate’ before pursuing ‘climate emergency’ policies further.
The past few years was (for the WEF) a trial run, when billions worldwide complied with mandates, lockdowns and experimental injections that have since proven to be not only useless for ‘prevention and spread' but also harmful. How harmful? Try asking the families of those killed by these injections, or the 140,000 Australian ‘vaccine injured’ so far reported by GPs to the TGA. Countless lives, relationships, careers and businesses were ruined for the sake of a flu virus that (according to ABS statistics) kills less people than the seasonal flus we’ve lived with for hundreds of years. Now, in place of a ‘health crisis’, the WEF have shifted focus to a ‘climate crisis’ to justify the next round of control and forced compliance.
In the name of all that is humane, wholesome and worth living (and dying) for, my appeal to you is above all else as fellow human beings. Do we want to live in a world where we are treated as (what the WEF regards as) soulless ‘hackable animals’ (their term), deprived of democratic rights, constantly surveilled, and penned into Orwellian Smart Cities on the grounds of an unproven ‘climate crisis’? Or do we want to live as free citizens in a democracy, enjoying all that makes life worthwhile: vibrant community, family values, personal liberty, free speech, human dignity, mutual respect and kindness, access to untouched nature, healthy food and relationships, and the right to celebrate sacred traditions? 
As Elon Musk recently wrote, the 'WEF is increasingly becoming an unelected world government that the people never asked for and don’t want.’ They are perilously close to achieving their objective of total control and it is only ‘we, the people’ who can put the brakes on this juggernaut. But will you, Peter and Susan, choose to be heroes, or moral cowards in this fight?
Time will tell. But I encourage you not to take too long to decide whose side you are on; are you for us, the people, or for the globalist ‘elites’ who have one soulless agenda: unlimited power and wealth?
Good work, by the way, on your recently stated aim of ‘moving closer to eliminating the use of environmentally harmful single-use plastics.’ That’s the kind of ethical and urgently needed action most of us are fully on-board with. It confronts a genuine, growing problem that impacts all life - and doesn’t impinge on our civil liberties. 
Finally, please be advised that this letter will be published online and copies will be sent to numerous Council members and media representatives. I shall also email copies to you both.
Yours sincerely
(Dr) Maureen B. Roberts BSc, BA (Hons), PhD, AMPS Member
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals